From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753701AbdJSWCr (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Oct 2017 18:02:47 -0400 Received: from gateway24.websitewelcome.com ([192.185.51.209]:34695 "EHLO gateway24.websitewelcome.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752008AbdJSWCq (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Oct 2017 18:02:46 -0400 Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 17:02:44 -0500 From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" To: Ursula Braun , "David S. Miller" Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Gustavo A. R. Silva" Subject: [PATCH] net: smc_close: mark expected switch fall-throughs Message-ID: <20171019220244.GA22041@embeddedor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator4166.hostgator.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - embeddedor.com X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 189.152.226.223 X-Exim-ID: 1e5Itp-001ozU-8t X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: (embeddedor) [189.152.226.223]:33834 X-Source-Auth: garsilva@embeddedor.com X-Email-Count: 5 X-Source-Cap: Z3V6aWRpbmU7Z3V6aWRpbmU7Z2F0b3I0MTY2Lmhvc3RnYXRvci5jb20= X-Local-Domain: yes Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that in this particular case I placed a "fall through" comment on its own line, which is what GCC is expecting to find. Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva --- net/smc/smc_close.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/smc/smc_close.c b/net/smc/smc_close.c index f0d16fb..9b16f40 100644 --- a/net/smc/smc_close.c +++ b/net/smc/smc_close.c @@ -360,7 +360,8 @@ static void smc_close_passive_work(struct work_struct *work) case SMC_PEERCLOSEWAIT1: if (rxflags->peer_done_writing) sk->sk_state = SMC_PEERCLOSEWAIT2; - /* fall through to check for closing */ + /* to check for closing */ + /* fall through */ case SMC_PEERCLOSEWAIT2: case SMC_PEERFINCLOSEWAIT: if (!smc_cdc_rxed_any_close(&smc->conn)) -- 2.7.4