* [PATCH] waitid(): Avoid unbalanced user_access_end() on access_ok() error
@ 2017-10-20 14:36 Kees Cook
2017-10-20 15:11 ` David Daney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kees Cook @ 2017-10-20 14:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds; +Cc: Al Viro, linux-kernel, David Daney
As pointed out by Linus and David, the earlier waitid() fix resulted in a
(currently harmless) unbalanced user_access_end() call. This fixes it to
just directly return EFAULT on access_ok() failure.
Fixes: 96ca579a1ecc ("waitid(): Add missing access_ok() checks")
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
---
This seems best to get fixed up now (in the same release where it was
introduced) before it tries to bite us at some later time.
---
kernel/exit.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
index cf28528842bc..f6cad39f35df 100644
--- a/kernel/exit.c
+++ b/kernel/exit.c
@@ -1611,7 +1611,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(waitid, int, which, pid_t, upid, struct siginfo __user *,
return err;
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, infop, sizeof(*infop)))
- goto Efault;
+ return -EFAULT;
user_access_begin();
unsafe_put_user(signo, &infop->si_signo, Efault);
@@ -1739,7 +1739,7 @@ COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE5(waitid,
return err;
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, infop, sizeof(*infop)))
- goto Efault;
+ return -EFAULT;
user_access_begin();
unsafe_put_user(signo, &infop->si_signo, Efault);
--
2.7.4
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] waitid(): Avoid unbalanced user_access_end() on access_ok() error
2017-10-20 14:36 [PATCH] waitid(): Avoid unbalanced user_access_end() on access_ok() error Kees Cook
@ 2017-10-20 15:11 ` David Daney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Daney @ 2017-10-20 15:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kees Cook, Linus Torvalds; +Cc: Al Viro, linux-kernel
On 10/20/2017 07:36 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
> As pointed out by Linus and David, the earlier waitid() fix resulted in a
> (currently harmless) unbalanced user_access_end() call. This fixes it to
> just directly return EFAULT on access_ok() failure.
>
> Fixes: 96ca579a1ecc ("waitid(): Add missing access_ok() checks")
> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> Cc: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Thanks Kees, this looks better to me ...
Acked-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
> ---
> This seems best to get fixed up now (in the same release where it was
> introduced) before it tries to bite us at some later time.
> ---
> kernel/exit.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
> index cf28528842bc..f6cad39f35df 100644
> --- a/kernel/exit.c
> +++ b/kernel/exit.c
> @@ -1611,7 +1611,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(waitid, int, which, pid_t, upid, struct siginfo __user *,
> return err;
>
> if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, infop, sizeof(*infop)))
> - goto Efault;
> + return -EFAULT;
>
> user_access_begin();
> unsafe_put_user(signo, &infop->si_signo, Efault);
> @@ -1739,7 +1739,7 @@ COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE5(waitid,
> return err;
>
> if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, infop, sizeof(*infop)))
> - goto Efault;
> + return -EFAULT;
>
> user_access_begin();
> unsafe_put_user(signo, &infop->si_signo, Efault);
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-10-20 15:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-10-20 14:36 [PATCH] waitid(): Avoid unbalanced user_access_end() on access_ok() error Kees Cook
2017-10-20 15:11 ` David Daney
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox