From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Cathy Avery <cavery@redhat.com>,
kys@microsoft.com, haiyangz@microsoft.com,
jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
dan.carpenter@oracle.com, devel@linuxdriverproject.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] scsi: storvsc: Allow only one remove lun work item to be issued per lun
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 08:44:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171021154444.GK1302522@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171019153510.GA7633@infradead.org>
Hello,
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 08:35:10AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 01:35:21PM -0400, Cathy Avery wrote:
> > + /*
> > + * Set the error handler work queue.
> > + */
> > + snprintf(host_dev->work_q_name, sizeof(host_dev->work_q_name),
> > + "storvsc_error_wq_%d", host->host_no);
> > + host_dev->handle_error_wq =
> > + create_singlethread_workqueue(host_dev->work_q_name);
>
> If you use alloc_ordered_workqueue directly instead of
> create_singlethread_workqueue you can pass a format string and don't
> need the separate allocation.
>
> But I'm not sure if Tejun is fine with using __WQ_LEGACY directly..
The only thing that flag does is exempting the workqueue from possible
flush deadlock check as we don't know whether WQ_MEM_RECLAIM on a
legacy workqueue is intentional. There's no reason to add it when
converting to alloc_ordered_workqueue(). Just decide whether it needs
forward progress guarantee and use WQ_MEM_RECLAIM if so.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-21 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-17 17:35 [PATCH V2] scsi: storvsc: Allow only one remove lun work item to be issued per lun Cathy Avery
2017-10-19 15:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-19 22:06 ` Long Li
2017-10-21 15:44 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2017-10-31 12:24 ` Martin K. Petersen
2017-10-31 12:31 ` Cathy Avery
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171021154444.GK1302522@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=cavery@redhat.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox