From: "Bruno E. O. Meneguele" <brdeoliv@redhat.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, serge@hallyn.com,
james.l.morris@oracle.com, dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com,
rusty@rustcorp.com.au, jeyu@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] module: export module signature enforcement status
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 14:24:36 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171023162436.GB2454@glitch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1508763415.3639.91.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2526 bytes --]
On 23-10, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-10-20 at 17:19 -0200, Bruno E. O. Meneguele wrote:
> > A static variable sig_enforce is used as status var to indicate the real
> > value of CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE, once this one is set the var will hold
> > true, but if the CONFIG is not set the status var will hold whatever
> > value is present in the module.sig_enforce kernel cmdline param: true
> > when =1 and false when =0 or not present.
> >
> > Considering this cmdline param take place over the CONFIG value when
> > it's not set, other places in the kernel could missbehave since they
>
> ^misbehave
>
right.
> > would have only the CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE value to rely on. Exporting
> > this status var allows the kernel to rely in the effective value of
> > module signature enforcement, being it from CONFIG value or cmdline
> > param.
>
> Thanks! There's a minor checkpatch warning below.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Bruno E. O. Meneguele <brdeoliv@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/module.h | 2 ++
> > kernel/module.c | 8 ++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h
> > index fe5aa3736707..ddfe17e3a85c 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/module.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/module.h
> > @@ -806,4 +806,6 @@ static inline bool module_sig_ok(struct module *module)
> > }
> > #endif /* CONFIG_MODULE_SIG */
> >
> > +bool is_module_sig_enforced(void);
> > +
> > #endif /* _LINUX_MODULE_H */
> > diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
> > index de66ec825992..b93c7ff44066 100644
> > --- a/kernel/module.c
> > +++ b/kernel/module.c
> > @@ -278,6 +278,14 @@ static bool sig_enforce = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE);
> > module_param(sig_enforce, bool_enable_only, 0644);
> > #endif /* !CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE */
> >
> > +/* Export sig_enforce kernel cmdline parameter to allow other subsystems rely
> > + * on that instead of directly to CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE config. */
>
> Checkpatch complains. Please use the normal format:
> /*
> *
> */
>
Oh, sure, sorry for that! I'll resend a v2 of the patchset in a minute.
Thanks.
> > +bool is_module_sig_enforced(void)
> > +{
> > + return sig_enforce;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(is_module_sig_enforced);
> > +
> > /* Block module loading/unloading? */
> > int modules_disabled = 0;
> > core_param(nomodule, modules_disabled, bint, 0);
>
--
bmeneg
PGP Key: http://bmeneg.com/pubkey.txt
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-23 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-20 19:19 [PATCH 0/2] ima: change how MODULE_SIG_FORCE is checked on modules checking policy Bruno E. O. Meneguele
2017-10-20 19:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] module: export module signature enforcement status Bruno E. O. Meneguele
2017-10-23 12:56 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-23 16:24 ` Bruno E. O. Meneguele [this message]
2017-10-20 19:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] ima: check signature enforcement against cmdline param instead of CONFIG Bruno E. O. Meneguele
2017-10-23 12:57 ` Mimi Zohar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171023162436.GB2454@glitch \
--to=brdeoliv@redhat.com \
--cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
--cc=james.l.morris@oracle.com \
--cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox