linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@intel.com>,
	"acme@kernel.org" <acme@kernel.org>,
	"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"jolsa@kernel.org" <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	"wangnan0@huawei.com" <wangnan0@huawei.com>,
	"hekuang@huawei.com" <hekuang@huawei.com>,
	"namhyung@kernel.org" <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	"alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com" 
	<alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	"Hunter, Adrian" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	"ak@linux.intel.com" <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/6] event synthesization multithreading for perf record
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 11:00:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171025090034.GA27028@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171024125944.uswroptykcqrgjox@gmail.com>

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 02:59:44PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > I recently made some changes on threaded record, which are based
> > on Namhyungs time* API, which is needed to read/sort the data afterwards
> > 
> > but I wasn't able to get any substantial and constant reduce of LOST events
> > and then I got sidetracked and did not finish, but it's in here:
> 
> So, in the context of system-wide profiling, the way that would work best I think 
> is the following:
> 
>   thread #0 binds itself to CPU#0 (via sched_setaffinity) and creates a per-CPU event on CPU#0
>   thread #1 binds itself to CPU#1 (via sched_setaffinity) and creates a per-CPU event on CPU#1
>   thread #2 binds itself to CPU#2 (via sched_setaffinity) and creates a per-CPU event on CPU#2
> 
> etc.
> 
> Is this how you implemented it?

in a way ;-) but I made it more generic and let record create just
few threads and let them share cpu subset.. and so there was no binding

> 
> If the threads in the thread pool are just free-running then the scheduler might 
> not migrate it to the 'right' CPU that is streaming the perf events and there will 
> be a lot of cross-talking between CPUs.

ok it's easy to add binding now and 1:1 thread:cpu mapping.. I'll retry

jirka

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-10-25  9:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-20 20:05 [PATCH V3 0/6] event synthesization multithreading for perf record kan.liang
2017-10-20 20:05 ` [PATCH V3 1/6] perf tools: pass thread info to process function kan.liang
2017-10-20 20:05 ` [PATCH V3 2/6] perf tools: pass thread info in event synthesization kan.liang
2017-10-20 20:05 ` [PATCH V3 3/6] perf tools: expose copyfile_offset() kan.liang
2017-10-20 20:05 ` [PATCH V3 4/6] perf tools: add perf_data_file__open_tmp kan.liang
2017-10-23 16:13   ` Jiri Olsa
2017-10-23 16:19     ` Liang, Kan
2017-10-23 16:26       ` Jiri Olsa
2017-10-23 18:05         ` Liang, Kan
2017-10-24  7:26           ` Jiri Olsa
2017-10-24  7:26   ` Jiri Olsa
2017-10-20 20:05 ` [PATCH V3 5/6] perf record: synthesize event multithreading support kan.liang
2017-10-20 20:05 ` [PATCH V3 6/6] perf record: add option to set the number of thread for event synthesize kan.liang
2017-10-23 11:48 ` [PATCH V3 0/6] event synthesization multithreading for perf record Ingo Molnar
2017-10-23 13:43   ` Liang, Kan
2017-10-23 14:25     ` acme
2017-10-23 18:45       ` Liang, Kan
2017-10-24  9:22     ` Ingo Molnar
2017-10-24 11:47       ` Jiri Olsa
2017-10-24 12:47         ` Liang, Kan
2017-10-24 12:59         ` Ingo Molnar
2017-10-24 13:08           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-10-24 13:25             ` Ingo Molnar
2017-10-25  2:35               ` Namhyung Kim
2017-10-25  9:02                 ` Jiri Olsa
2017-10-25  9:00           ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2017-10-25  9:07             ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171025090034.GA27028@krava \
    --to=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hekuang@huawei.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).