public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
To: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Cc: eric.auger.pro@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	marc.zyngier@arm.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org,
	andre.przywara@arm.com, wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com,
	wu.wubin@huawei.com, drjones@redhat.com, wei@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: New helper functions to free the caches
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 12:31:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171025103121.GF91785@lvm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1508767709-15256-8-git-send-email-eric.auger@redhat.com>

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 04:08:26PM +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
> From: wanghaibin <wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com>
> 
> We create two new functions that free the device and
> collection lists. They are currently called by vgic_its_destroy()
> and other callers will be added in subsequent patches.
> 
> We also remove the check on its->device_list.next.
> Lists are initialized in vgic_create_its() and the device
> is added to the device list only if this latter succeeds.
> 
> vgic_its_destroy is the device destroy ops. This latter is called
> by kvm_destroy_devices() which loops on all created devices. So
> at this point the list is initialized.
> 
> Signed-off-by: wanghaibin <wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
> 

Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>

> ---
> 
> v4 -> v5:
> - add mutex_lock in vgic_its_free_collection_list
> - use list_for_each_entry_safe
> - reword commit message
> ---
>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
> index 2f3c3a1..8098f91 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
> @@ -910,6 +910,30 @@ static void vgic_its_free_device(struct kvm *kvm, struct its_device *device)
>  	kfree(device);
>  }
>  
> +static void vgic_its_free_device_list(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its)
> +{
> +	struct its_device *cur, *temp;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&its->its_lock);
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(cur, temp, &its->device_list, dev_list)
> +		vgic_its_free_device(kvm, cur);
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&its->its_lock);
> +}
> +
> +static void vgic_its_free_collection_list(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its)
> +{
> +	struct its_collection *cur, *temp;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&its->its_lock);
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(cur, temp, &its->collection_list, coll_list)
> +		vgic_its_free_collection(its, cur->collection_id);
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&its->its_lock);
> +}
> +
>  /* Must be called with its_lock mutex held */
>  static struct its_device *vgic_its_alloc_device(struct vgic_its *its,
>  						u32 device_id, gpa_t itt_addr,
> @@ -1627,32 +1651,9 @@ static void vgic_its_destroy(struct kvm_device *kvm_dev)
>  {
>  	struct kvm *kvm = kvm_dev->kvm;
>  	struct vgic_its *its = kvm_dev->private;
> -	struct list_head *cur, *temp;
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * We may end up here without the lists ever having been initialized.
> -	 * Check this and bail out early to avoid dereferencing a NULL pointer.
> -	 */
> -	if (!its->device_list.next)
> -		return;
> -
> -	mutex_lock(&its->its_lock);
> -	list_for_each_safe(cur, temp, &its->device_list) {
> -		struct its_device *dev;
> -
> -		dev = list_entry(cur, struct its_device, dev_list);
> -		vgic_its_free_device(kvm, dev);
> -	}
> -
> -	list_for_each_safe(cur, temp, &its->collection_list) {
> -		struct its_collection *coll;
> -
> -		coll = list_entry(cur, struct its_collection, coll_list);
> -		list_del(cur);
> -		kfree(coll);
> -	}
> -	mutex_unlock(&its->its_lock);
>  
> +	vgic_its_free_device_list(kvm, its);
> +	vgic_its_free_collection_list(kvm, its);
>  	kfree(its);
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.5.5
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-25 10:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-23 14:08 [PATCH v5 00/10] vITS Migration fixes and reset Eric Auger
2017-10-23 14:08 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Fix return value for device table restore Eric Auger
2017-10-24 16:02   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-23 14:08 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Fix vgic_its_restore_collection_table returned value Eric Auger
2017-10-24 16:15   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-23 14:08 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Check CBASER/BASER validity before enabling the ITS Eric Auger
2017-10-25  9:38   ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-25  9:46     ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-25 11:52   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-23 14:08 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Check GITS_BASER Valid bit before saving tables Eric Auger
2017-10-25  9:47   ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-23 14:08 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Save the collection table before device tables Eric Auger
2017-10-25  9:59   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-23 14:08 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Remove kvm_its_unmap_device Eric Auger
2017-10-25  9:45   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-23 14:08 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: New helper functions to free the caches Eric Auger
2017-10-25 10:31   ` Christoffer Dall [this message]
2017-10-25 10:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-23 14:08 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Free caches when GITS_BASER Valid bit is cleared Eric Auger
2017-10-25 10:23   ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-23 14:08 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] KVM: arm/arm64: Document KVM_DEV_ARM_ITS_CTRL_RESET Eric Auger
2017-10-25 10:40   ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-23 14:08 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Implement KVM_DEV_ARM_ITS_CTRL_RESET Eric Auger
2017-10-25 10:52   ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171025103121.GF91785@lvm \
    --to=cdall@linaro.org \
    --cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=eric.auger.pro@gmail.com \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=wei@redhat.com \
    --cc=wu.wubin@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox