From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751712AbdJZG1k (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Oct 2017 02:27:40 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:38593 "EHLO out4-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750884AbdJZG1i (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Oct 2017 02:27:38 -0400 X-ME-Sender: Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 17:27:34 +1100 From: "Tobin C. Harding" To: Joe Perches Cc: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, "Jason A. Donenfeld" , "Theodore Ts'o" , Linus Torvalds , Kees Cook , Paolo Bonzini , Tycho Andersen , "Roberts, William C" , Tejun Heo , Jordan Glover , Greg KH , Petr Mladek , Ian Campbell , Sergey Senozhatsky , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Steven Rostedt , Chris Fries , Dave Weinstein , Daniel Micay , Djalal Harouni , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 1/2] printk: remove tabular output for NULL pointer Message-ID: <20171026062734.GH12341@eros> References: <1508986436-31966-1-git-send-email-me@tobin.cc> <1508986436-31966-2-git-send-email-me@tobin.cc> <1508993843.10651.22.camel@perches.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1508993843.10651.22.camel@perches.com> X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.24 (2015-08-30) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Joe, thanks for your review. On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 09:57:23PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Thu, 2017-10-26 at 13:53 +1100, Tobin C. Harding wrote: > > Currently pointer() checks for a NULL pointer argument and then if so > > attempts to print "(null)" with _some_ standard width. This width cannot > > correctly be ascertained here because many of the printk specifiers > > print pointers of varying widths. > > I believe this is not a good change. > Only pointers without a extension call pointer() Sorry, I don't understand what you mean here. All the %p specifier code is handled by pointer()? > > Remove the attempt to print NULL pointers with a correct width. > > the correct width for a %p is the default width. It is the default width if we are printing addresses. Once we hash 64 bit address to a 32 bit identifier then we don't have a default width. > The correct width for %p is unknown. I agree. If I have misunderstood you, please forgive me. I am very appreciative of the reviews this patch is getting and the patience the list is having with the many iterations. thanks, Tobin.