From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752851AbdJ3X2z (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Oct 2017 19:28:55 -0400 Received: from mail-io0-f196.google.com ([209.85.223.196]:53470 "EHLO mail-io0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752648AbdJ3X2x (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Oct 2017 19:28:53 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+Sg8C/dlZBUCAotFgBpi2hcb5p91qV6wcaF12kDSqk+MiCokf0kwnJllt2zunFftlcFIrsFQA== Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 16:28:49 -0700 From: Eric Biggers To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Christoffer Dall , Marc Zyngier , Christian Borntraeger , Cornelia Huck , James Hogan , Paul Mackerras , kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, Kees Cook , Christian Borntraeger , Christoffer Dall , Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH 1/2] kvm: whitelist struct kvm_vcpu_arch Message-ID: <20171030232849.GA8409@gmail.com> References: <20171026134547.23664-1-pbonzini@redhat.com> <20171026134547.23664-2-pbonzini@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20171026134547.23664-2-pbonzini@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 03:45:46PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On x86, ARM and s390, struct kvm_vcpu_arch has a usercopy region > taht is read and written by the KVM_GET/SET_CPUID2 ioctls (x86) > or KVM_GET/SET_ONE_REG (ARM/s390). Without whitelisting the area, > KVM is completely broken on those architectures with usercopy hardening > enabled. > > For now, allow writing to the entire struct on all architectures. > The KVM tree will not refine this to an architecture-specific > subset of struct kvm_vcpu_arch. > > Cc: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com > Cc: Kees Cook > Cc: Christian Borntraeger > Cc: Christoffer Dall > Cc: Radim Krčmář > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini > --- > virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 8 ++++++-- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c > index 4d81f6ded88e..b4809ccfdfa1 100644 > --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c > +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c > @@ -4005,8 +4005,12 @@ int kvm_init(void *opaque, unsigned vcpu_size, unsigned vcpu_align, > /* A kmem cache lets us meet the alignment requirements of fx_save. */ > if (!vcpu_align) > vcpu_align = __alignof__(struct kvm_vcpu); > - kvm_vcpu_cache = kmem_cache_create("kvm_vcpu", vcpu_size, vcpu_align, > - 0, NULL); > + kvm_vcpu_cache = > + kmem_cache_create_usercopy("kvm_vcpu", > + sizeof(struct kvm_vcpu), vcpu_align, > + 0, offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu, arch), > + sizeof_field(struct kvm_vcpu, arch), > + NULL); Doesn't it need to be 'vcpu_size' instead of 'sizeof(struct kvm_vcpu)'? Eric