From: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>
To: Mario.Limonciello@dell.com
Cc: pali.rohar@gmail.com, andy.shevchenko@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, luto@kernel.org,
quasisec@google.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, mjg59@google.com,
hch@lst.de, greg@kroah.com, gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 05/15] platform/x86: dell-wmi-descriptor: split WMI descriptor into it's own driver
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 16:31:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171031233146.GA5787@fury> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <27e2d166f2ce461fb025ebf06a284d01@ausx13mpc124.AMER.DELL.COM>
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 01:32:57PM +0000, Mario.Limonciello@dell.com wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Pali Rohár [mailto:pali.rohar@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, October 30, 2017 6:47 AM
> > To: Limonciello, Mario <Mario_Limonciello@Dell.com>
> > Cc: dvhart@infradead.org; Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>;
> > LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org; Andy
> > Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>; quasisec@google.com; rjw@rjwysocki.net;
> > mjg59@google.com; hch@lst.de; Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>; Alan Cox
> > <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 05/15] platform/x86: dell-wmi-descriptor: split WMI
> > descriptor into it's own driver
> >
> > On Friday 20 October 2017 12:40:20 Mario Limonciello wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/dell-wmi-descriptor.c
> > b/drivers/platform/x86/dell-wmi-descriptor.c
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..3204c408e261
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/dell-wmi-descriptor.c
> >
> > This dell-wmi-descriptor.c looks good now!
> >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/dell-wmi-descriptor.h
> > b/drivers/platform/x86/dell-wmi-descriptor.h
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..5f7b69c2c83a
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/dell-wmi-descriptor.h
> > > @@ -721,7 +652,9 @@ static int dell_wmi_events_set_enabled(bool enable)
> > > static int dell_wmi_probe(struct wmi_device *wdev)
> > > {
> > > struct dell_wmi_priv *priv;
> > > - int err;
> > > +
> > > + if (!wmi_has_guid(DELL_WMI_DESCRIPTOR_GUID))
> > > + return -ENODEV;
> > >
> > > priv = devm_kzalloc(
> > > &wdev->dev, sizeof(struct dell_wmi_priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > @@ -729,9 +662,8 @@ static int dell_wmi_probe(struct wmi_device *wdev)
> > > return -ENOMEM;
> > > dev_set_drvdata(&wdev->dev, priv);
> > >
> > > - err = dell_wmi_check_descriptor_buffer(wdev);
> > > - if (err)
> > > - return err;
> > > + if (!dell_wmi_get_interface_version(&priv->interface_version))
> > > + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> >
> > But here is still a problem. You added check that
> > DELL_WMI_DESCRIPTOR_GUID exists in APCI table, but it does not mean that
> > probe method of dell-wmi-descriptor cannot fail.
> >
> > With PROBE_DEFER, dell_wmi_probe function would be called later again
> > and again, even when probing dell-wmi-descriptor failed and so dell-wmi
> > in this case cannot work.
> >
>
> Yes it's possible that probe method can fail, but it depends on the reason for
> failure if it will fail again later. For example if not enough memory, it may work
> later. Or maybe user manually unbound from GUID, should continue to try until
> it's bound again.
>
> So in short, I believe this is the correct behavior to adopt.
In this case, I believe the synchronous request_module("dell-wmi-descriptor")
would provide the desired result. The exit status doesn't even need to be
checked. If that is successful, and the interface_version still returns false,
then it can be considered an error and we can exit. If it fails, the
interface_version will return false, and it is also an error.
This can be easily added as a single patch on top of this series:
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/dell-wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/dell-wmi.c
index dcfa5de..964ca54 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/dell-wmi.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/dell-wmi.c
@@ -665,8 +665,9 @@ static int dell_wmi_probe(struct wmi_device *wdev)
return -ENOMEM;
dev_set_drvdata(&wdev->dev, priv);
+ request_module("dell-wmi-descriptor");
if (!dell_wmi_get_interface_version(&priv->interface_version))
- return -EPROBE_DEFER;
+ return -ENODEV;
return dell_wmi_input_setup(wdev);
}
Pali, I believe this addresses your concern?
--
Darren Hart
VMware Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-31 23:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-20 17:40 [PATCH v11 00/15] Introduce support for Dell SMBIOS over WMI Mario Limonciello
2017-10-20 17:40 ` [PATCH v11 01/15] platform/x86: wmi: Add new method wmidev_evaluate_method Mario Limonciello
2017-10-20 17:40 ` [PATCH v11 02/15] platform/x86: dell-wmi: increase severity of some failures Mario Limonciello
2017-10-20 17:40 ` [PATCH v11 03/15] platform/x86: dell-wmi: clean up wmi descriptor check Mario Limonciello
2017-10-20 17:40 ` [PATCH v11 04/15] platform/x86: dell-wmi: don't check length returned Mario Limonciello
2017-10-20 17:40 ` [PATCH v11 05/15] platform/x86: dell-wmi-descriptor: split WMI descriptor into it's own driver Mario Limonciello
2017-10-30 11:46 ` Pali Rohár
2017-10-30 13:32 ` Mario.Limonciello
2017-10-31 23:31 ` Darren Hart [this message]
2017-11-01 8:19 ` Pali Rohár
2017-11-01 16:42 ` Mario.Limonciello
2017-10-20 17:40 ` [PATCH v11 06/15] platform/x86: wmi: Don't allow drivers to get each other's GUIDs Mario Limonciello
2017-10-20 17:40 ` [PATCH v11 07/15] platform/x86: dell-smbios: only run if proper oem string is detected Mario Limonciello
2017-10-20 17:40 ` [PATCH v11 08/15] platform/x86: dell-smbios: Add a sysfs interface for SMBIOS tokens Mario Limonciello
2017-10-30 11:56 ` Pali Rohár
2017-10-30 13:36 ` Mario.Limonciello
2017-10-31 15:24 ` Darren Hart
2017-10-20 17:40 ` [PATCH v11 09/15] platform/x86: dell-smbios: Introduce dispatcher for SMM calls Mario Limonciello
2017-10-20 17:40 ` [PATCH v11 10/15] platform/x86: dell-smbios-wmi: Add new WMI dispatcher driver Mario Limonciello
2017-10-20 17:40 ` [PATCH v11 11/15] platform/x86: dell-smbios-smm: test for WSMT Mario Limonciello
2017-10-20 17:40 ` [PATCH v11 12/15] platform/x86: dell-smbios: Add filtering support Mario Limonciello
2017-10-20 17:40 ` [PATCH v11 13/15] platform/x86: wmi: create userspace interface for drivers Mario Limonciello
2017-10-20 17:40 ` [PATCH v11 14/15] platform/x86: dell-smbios-wmi: introduce userspace interface Mario Limonciello
2017-10-28 13:18 ` Darren Hart
2017-11-01 0:27 ` Edward O'Callaghan
2017-11-01 16:15 ` Mario.Limonciello
2017-10-20 17:40 ` [PATCH v11 15/15] tools/wmi: add a sample for dell smbios communication over WMI Mario Limonciello
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171031233146.GA5787@fury \
--to=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=Mario.Limonciello@dell.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@google.com \
--cc=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quasisec@google.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox