public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kan.liang@intel.com,
	acme@kernel.org, kernel-team@lge.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf mmap: Fix perf backward recording
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 13:39:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171101123957.GA27215@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <109f02ef-5dc2-94f9-e850-572c498781ee@huawei.com>

On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 08:10:49PM +0800, Wangnan (F) wrote:

SNIP

> > > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
> > > > index c6c891e154a6..27ebe355e794 100644
> > > > --- a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
> > > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
> > > > @@ -838,6 +838,11 @@ static int perf_evlist__mmap_per_evsel(struct perf_evlist *evlist, int idx,
> > > >                   if (*output == -1) {
> > > >                           *output = fd;
> > > > +                       if (evsel->attr.write_backward)
> > > > +                               mp->prot = PROT_READ;
> > > > +                       else
> > > > +                               mp->prot = PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE;
> > > > +
> > > If evlist->overwrite is true, PROT_WRITE should be unset even if
> > > write_backward is
> > > not set. If you want to delay the setting of mp->prot, you need to consider
> > > both evlist->overwrite and evsel->attr.write_backward.
> > I thought evsel->attr.write_backward should be set when
> > evlist->overwrite is set.  Do you mean following case?
> > 
> >    perf record --overwrite -e 'cycles/no-overwrite/'
> > 
> 
> No. evlist->overwrite is unrelated to '--overwrite'. This is why I
> said the concept of 'overwrite' and 'backward' is ambiguous.
> 
> perf record never sets 'evlist->overwrite'. What '--overwrite' actually
> does is setting write_backward. Some testcases needs overwrite evlist.

did not check deeply, but so why can't we do the below?

jirka


---
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
index f4d9fc54b382..4643c487bd29 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ static int record__mmap_evlist(struct record *rec,
 	struct record_opts *opts = &rec->opts;
 	char msg[512];
 
-	if (perf_evlist__mmap_ex(evlist, opts->mmap_pages, false,
+	if (perf_evlist__mmap_ex(evlist, opts->mmap_pages, opts->overwrite,
 				 opts->auxtrace_mmap_pages,
 				 opts->auxtrace_snapshot_mode) < 0) {
 		if (errno == EPERM) {

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-01 12:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-01  5:53 [PATCH 0/2] perf record: Fix --overwrite and clarify concepts Wang Nan
2017-11-01  5:53 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf mmap: Fix perf backward recording Wang Nan
2017-11-01  9:49   ` Namhyung Kim
2017-11-01 10:32     ` Wangnan (F)
2017-11-01 12:00       ` Namhyung Kim
2017-11-01 12:10         ` Wangnan (F)
2017-11-01 12:39           ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2017-11-01 12:56             ` Wangnan (F)
2017-11-02 15:12               ` Jiri Olsa
2017-11-01 13:57           ` Liang, Kan
2017-11-01 16:12             ` Wangnan (F)
2017-11-01 16:22               ` Liang, Kan
2017-11-02  5:34                 ` Namhyung Kim
2017-11-02 13:25                   ` Liang, Kan
2017-11-02 14:59                     ` Jiri Olsa
2017-11-01  5:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf record: Replace 'overwrite' by 'flightrecorder' for better naming Wang Nan
2017-11-01 10:03   ` Namhyung Kim
2017-11-01 10:17     ` Wangnan (F)
2017-11-01 12:03       ` Namhyung Kim
2017-11-01 13:26   ` Liang, Kan
2017-11-01 14:05     ` Wangnan (F)
2017-11-01 14:22       ` Liang, Kan
2017-11-01 14:44         ` Wangnan (F)
2017-11-01 15:04           ` Liang, Kan
2017-11-01 16:00             ` Wangnan (F)
2017-11-01 16:13               ` Liang, Kan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171101123957.GA27215@krava \
    --to=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox