public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Du, Changbin" <changbin.du@intel.com>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	changbin.du@intel.com, Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, build: Improve the isolinux searching of isoimage generation
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 22:28:49 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171101142849.GA23254@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK7LNARFf8RDCsqdWZ9_YDddmTVaKo2i146wbBac-cSCPK5uaQ@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3491 bytes --]

Hi Ingo and Yamada,
Thanks for your suggestions. I'll have a try though I am not familiar with kbuild system.

On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 12:17:50PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> 2017-10-31 18:39 GMT+09:00 Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>:
> >
> > * changbin.du@intel.com <changbin.du@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> >> From: Changbin Du <changbin.du@intel.com>
> >>
> >> Recently I failed to build isoimage target, because the path of isolinux.bin
> >> changed to /usr/xxx/ISOLINUX/isolinux.bin, as well as ldlinux.c32 which
> >> changed to /usr/xxx/syslinux/modules/bios/ldlinux.c32.
> >>
> >> This patch has a improvement of the file search:
> >>   - Don't print the raw shell commands. It doesn't make sense to show the
> >>     entire big block.
> >>   - Show a error message instead of silent fail.
> >>   - Add above new paths.
> >>
> >> Now it becomes:
> >> Kernel: arch/x86/boot/bzImage is ready  (#62)
> >> rm -rf arch/x86/boot/isoimage
> >> mkdir arch/x86/boot/isoimage
> >> Using /usr/lib/ISOLINUX/isolinux.bin
> >> Using /usr/lib/syslinux/modules/bios/ldlinux.c32
> >> cp arch/x86/boot/bzImage arch/x86/boot/isoimage/linux
> >> ...
> >>
> >> Before:
> >> Kernel: arch/x86/boot/bzImage is ready  (#63)
> >> rm -rf arch/x86/boot/isoimage
> >> mkdir arch/x86/boot/isoimage
> >> for i in lib lib64 share end ; do \
> >>       if [ -f /usr/$i/syslinux/isolinux.bin ] ; then \
> >>               cp /usr/$i/syslinux/isolinux.bin arch/x86/boot/isoimage ; \
> >>               if [ -f /usr/$i/syslinux/ldlinux.c32 ]; then \
> >>                       cp /usr/$i/syslinux/ldlinux.c32 arch/x86/boot/isoimage ; \
> >>               fi ; \
> >>               break ; \
> >>       fi ; \
> >>       if [ $i = end ] ; then exit 1 ; fi ; \
> >> done
> >> arch/x86/boot/Makefile:161: recipe for target 'isoimage' failed
> >> make[1]: *** [isoimage] Error 1
> >
> > I like these changes. Could we please further improve it: for example the boot
> > image build messages are still pretty unstructured, while regular build system
> > messages come in the following format:
> >
> >   CC      arch/x86/events/msr.o
> >   RELOCS  arch/x86/realmode/rm/realmode.relocs
> >   OBJCOPY arch/x86/realmode/rm/realmode.bin
> >   CC      arch/x86/kernel/signal.o
> >   AS      arch/x86/realmode/rmpiggy.o
> >   CC      ipc/msg.o
> >   AR      arch/x86/ia32/built-in.o
> >   CC      arch/x86/events/amd/iommu.o
> >   CC      init/do_mounts.o
> >   AR      arch/x86/realmode/built-in.o
> >
> > So instead of:
> >
> >> Kernel: arch/x86/boot/bzImage is ready  (#62)
> >> rm -rf arch/x86/boot/isoimage
> >> mkdir arch/x86/boot/isoimage
> >> Using /usr/lib/ISOLINUX/isolinux.bin
> >> Using /usr/lib/syslinux/modules/bios/ldlinux.c32
> >> cp arch/x86/boot/bzImage arch/x86/boot/isoimage/linux
> >
> > Could we make it something more streamlined and similar to the rest of the build
> > as well, like:
> >
> >   GEN     arch/x86/boot/bzImage
> >   GEN     arch/x86/boot/isoimage
> >   GEN     arch/x86/boot/isoimage/linux
> >
> > I.e. only mention the new files built, with an appropriate prefix.
> >
> > I've Cc:-ed the kbuild maintainers, maybe they have a better suggestion instead of
> > the 'GEN' abbreviation?
> >
> 
> Generally, the abbreviation is the tool that has processed the target,
> but if you do not find an appropriate one, 'GEN' is fine.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Best Regards
> Masahiro Yamada

-- 
Thanks,
Changbin Du

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2017-11-01 14:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-31  4:45 [PATCH] x86, build: Improve the isolinux searching of isoimage generation changbin.du
2017-10-31  9:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-11-01  3:17   ` Masahiro Yamada
2017-11-01 14:28     ` Du, Changbin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171101142849.GA23254@intel.com \
    --to=changbin.du@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mmarek@suse.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox