From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933510AbdKCNz1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Nov 2017 09:55:27 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:60108 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933376AbdKCNzX (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Nov 2017 09:55:23 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 98D6F21908 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=acme@kernel.org From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Ingo Molnar Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Adrian Hunter , David Ahern , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , Wang Nan Subject: [PATCH 01/19] perf script: Add a few missing conversions to fprintf style Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 10:54:45 -0300 Message-Id: <20171103135503.4921-2-acme@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.13.6 In-Reply-To: <20171103135503.4921-1-acme@kernel.org> References: <20171103135503.4921-1-acme@kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo In a1a587073ccd ("perf script: Use fprintf like printing uniformly") there were a few cases that were missed, fix it. Reported-by: yuzhoujian Cc: Adrian Hunter Cc: David Ahern Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Namhyung Kim Cc: Wang Nan Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-sq9hvfk5mkjdqzlpyiq7jkos@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo --- tools/perf/builtin-script.c | 9 ++++----- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c index a3add2cd7856..db4ff1510dc5 100644 --- a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c @@ -1447,7 +1447,7 @@ static void process_event(struct perf_script *script, perf_sample__fprintf_start(sample, thread, evsel, fp); if (PRINT_FIELD(PERIOD)) - printf("%10" PRIu64 " ", sample->period); + fprintf(fp, "%10" PRIu64 " ", sample->period); if (PRINT_FIELD(EVNAME)) { const char *evname = perf_evsel__name(evsel); @@ -1455,8 +1455,7 @@ static void process_event(struct perf_script *script, if (!script->name_width) script->name_width = perf_evlist__max_name_len(script->session->evlist); - printf("%*s: ", script->name_width, - evname ? evname : "[unknown]"); + fprintf(fp, "%*s: ", script->name_width, evname ?: "[unknown]"); } if (print_flags) @@ -1513,8 +1512,8 @@ static void process_event(struct perf_script *script, perf_sample__fprintf_insn(sample, attr, thread, machine, fp); if (PRINT_FIELD(PHYS_ADDR)) - printf("%16" PRIx64, sample->phys_addr); - printf("\n"); + fprintf(fp, "%16" PRIx64, sample->phys_addr); + fprintf(fp, "\n"); } static struct scripting_ops *scripting_ops; -- 2.13.6