From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: "Javier González" <jg@lightnvm.io>,
sagi@grimberg.me, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Javier González" <javier@cnexlabs.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] nvme: do not check for ns on rw path
Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2017 09:38:45 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171104153844.GA12777@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171104081825.GA19180@lst.de>
On Sat, Nov 04, 2017 at 09:18:25AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 09:02:04AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> > If the namespace has metadata, but the request doesn't have a metadata
> > payload attached to it for whatever reason, we can't construct the command
> > for that format. We also can't have the controller strip/generate the
> > payload with PRACT bit set if it's not a T10 format, so we just fail
> > the command.
>
> The only metadata payload a READ or WRITE request can have is a protection
> information one. For a namespace formatted with protection information
> bio_integrity_prep as called from blk_mq_make_request will ensure we
> always have metadata attached.
>
> If a namespace is formatted with non-PI metadata we will never have
> metadata attached to the bio/request and should not even present the
> namespace to the kernel.
That's not quite right. For non-PI metadata formats, we use the
'nop_profile', which gets the metadata buffer allocated so we can safely
use a metadata formatted namespace. There's no in-kernel user of the
allocated payload, but we still need the metadata buffer in order to
use the namespace at all.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-04 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-03 10:02 [PATCH 0/3] nvme: small fixes reported by smatch Javier González
2017-11-03 10:02 ` [PATCH 1/3] nvme: do not check for ns on rw path Javier González
2017-11-03 12:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-03 13:00 ` Javier González
2017-11-03 15:02 ` Keith Busch
2017-11-04 8:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-04 15:38 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2017-11-06 9:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-06 14:43 ` Keith Busch
2017-11-03 10:02 ` [PATCH 2/3] nvme: compare NQN string with right size Javier González
2017-11-03 12:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-03 12:56 ` Javier González
2017-11-03 10:02 ` [PATCH 3/3] nvme: fix eui_show() print format Javier González
2017-11-03 12:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-03 15:13 ` Keith Busch
2017-11-03 15:16 ` Joe Perches
2017-11-04 11:22 ` Javier González
2017-11-07 16:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-07 16:36 ` Javier González
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171104153844.GA12777@localhost.localdomain \
--to=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=javier@cnexlabs.com \
--cc=jg@lightnvm.io \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox