From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
leedom@chelsio.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Harsh@chelsio.com, jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d: Fix scatterlist offset handling
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 10:47:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171106104709.06b38f7c@jacob-builder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171006144309.GA30803@8bytes.org>
On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 16:43:09 +0200
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 07:05:17PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > Now, there are indeed plenty of drivers and subsystems which do
> > work on lists of explicitly single pages - anything doing some
> > variant of "addr = kmap_atomic(sg_page(sg)) + sg->offset;" is easy
> > to spot - but I don't think DMA API implementations are in a
> > position to make any kind of assumption; nearly all of them just
> > shut up and handle sg->length bytes from sg_phys(sg) without
> > questioning the caller, and I reckon that's exactly what they
> > should be doing.
>
> I agree with that, it is not explicitly forbidden to have an
> sg->offset > PAGE_SIZE and most IOMMU drivers handle this case.
>
> So this is a problem I'd like to see resolved in the VT-d driver too.
> If nobody comes up with a correct fix soon I'll apply this one and
> rip out the large-page support from __domain_mapping() to make it
> work.
>
Hi All,
Just to give an update on the offline debugging of this issue. With
Robin's patch applied, I was able to reproduce the failure with
similar configuration that Jain helped to set up.
I added trace prints just to see the map/unmap activities leading to
the DMAR fault. When fault occurs, the trace shows there is an unmap to
the offending iova pfn. So I think this is a separate problem than
Robin's patch is fixing. I think we should move forward to merge this
patch upstream and stable. The remaining problem is likely a race
condition between unmap and DMA activities.
Here a brief extracted log, ee3d7 is the iova pfn in question.
#1. map sg pfn ee3d7
<idle>-0 [076] 74124.154254: bprint: __domain_mapping: vpfn:ee3d7, pgoff=2126, np:1, da:ee3d784e, len:1464
, ppfn:1849c9c
#2. unmap ee3d7000
<idle>-0 [054] 74124.154301: bprint: intel_unmap: Device 0000:18:00.4 unmapping: pfn ee3d7-ee3d7
<idle>-0 [076] 74124.154301: bprint: __domain_mapping: lvlpg:1, nrpg 0, vpfn:ec2ff, ppfn:183221a, sg_res:0
<idle>-0 [059] 74124.154302: bprint: __domain_mapping: lvlpg:1, nrpg 0, vpfn:ee719, ppfn:c3e4dd, sg_res:0
<idle>-0 [076] 74124.154302: bprint: __domain_mapping: vpfn:f183b, pgoff=78, np:1, da:f183b04e, len:1464,
#3. DMA to unmapped address ee3d7000, DMAR fault raised.
+2.952861] dmar_fault: 6 callbacks suppressed
+0.000002] DMAR: DRHD: handling fault status reg 2
+0.005588] turning tracing off
+0.003592] DMAR: [DMA Write] Request device [18:00.4] fault addr ee3d7000 [fault reason 05] PTE Write access is not set
<idle>-0 [000] 74124.156906: bputs:
0xffffffffb259916bs: turning tracing off
Thanks,
Jacob
> Speaking of __domain_mapping(), this function is a big unmaintainable
> mess which should be split and rewritten. A clean and maintainable
> rewrite can alse re-add the large-page support.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Joerg
>
> _______________________________________________
> iommu mailing list
> iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
[Jacob Pan]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-06 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-28 14:14 [PATCH] iommu/vt-d: Fix scatterlist offset handling Robin Murphy
2017-09-28 16:17 ` Casey Leedom
2017-09-28 13:29 ` Raj, Ashok
2017-09-28 16:59 ` Robin Murphy
2017-09-28 15:43 ` Raj, Ashok
2017-10-03 19:36 ` Raj, Ashok
2017-09-29 8:14 ` Harsh Jain
2017-09-29 16:18 ` Casey Leedom
[not found] ` <e2c92d3a-3d5d-a0eb-7d5f-a9453e48cfd5@chelsio.com>
2017-10-03 22:22 ` Casey Leedom
2017-10-03 12:55 ` David Woodhouse
2017-10-03 18:05 ` Robin Murphy
2017-10-03 22:16 ` David Woodhouse
2017-10-04 11:18 ` Robin Murphy
2017-10-06 14:43 ` Joerg Roedel
2017-10-06 12:54 ` Raj, Ashok
2017-11-06 18:47 ` Jacob Pan [this message]
2017-11-15 23:54 ` Jacob Pan
2017-11-16 21:32 ` Alex Williamson
2017-11-16 21:09 ` Raj, Ashok
2017-11-17 16:18 ` Alex Williamson
2017-11-17 15:48 ` Raj, Ashok
2017-11-17 17:44 ` Casey Leedom
2017-11-17 18:09 ` Jacob Pan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171106104709.06b38f7c@jacob-builder \
--to=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Harsh@chelsio.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=leedom@chelsio.com \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox