From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1754227AbdKGCUZ (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 6 Nov 2017 21:20:25 -0500
Received: from muru.com ([72.249.23.125]:47000 "EHLO muru.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1754075AbdKGCUY (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 6 Nov 2017 21:20:24 -0500
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 18:20:21 -0800
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Regression still in next for drop migrate type checks
Message-ID: <20171107022021.GO28152@atomide.com>
References: <20171103160012.GF28152@atomide.com>
 <20171104082500.qvzbb2kw4suo6cgy@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <20171106143804.GM28152@atomide.com>
 <20171106144216.g6ee3vrzyu7bstzh@dhcp22.suse.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20171106144216.g6ee3vrzyu7bstzh@dhcp22.suse.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

* Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> [171106 14:44]:
> On Mon 06-11-17 06:38:04, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> [171104 08:26]:
> > > On Fri 03-11-17 09:00:12, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > > 
> > > > Looks like I'm still carrying patch "mm: distinguish CMA and MOVABLE
> > > > isolation in  has_unmovable_pages" from Michal [1] for commit e1d753dff0fa
> > > > ("mm: drop migrate type checks from has_unmovable_pages") and Linux next
> > > > has been broken for CMA for few weeks now as noted in the discussion
> > > > also at [1].
> > > > 
> > > > What's the status of this regression? How come it's been known
> > > > broken for two weeks and still not fixed or reverted in next?
> > > > This is clearly is not suitable for "wider testing" ;)
> > > 
> > > This is the first time I hear about the regression. Joonsoo has pointed
> > > out that there might be a problem but he didn't have any specific
> > > failure in hands. The fix has been posted [1] and Andrew has picked it
> > > up few days ago. Could you try to apply that patch? It will show up in
> > > linux-next as soon as Andrew releases mmotm.
> > 
> > Yes thanks I can confirm that next-20171106 works for me. So as far as
> > I'm concerned, we're good to go.
> 
> Can I assume your Tested-by?

Yes sounds like it already got added.

Regards,

Tony