From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: ulpi: Add missing of_node_get() in ulpi_of_register()
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 16:25:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171111152516.GN11226@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171111014300.2982-1-sboyd@codeaurora.org>
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 05:43:00PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> In ulpi_of_register() we call of_find_node_by_name() which
> unconditionally calls of_node_put() on the 'from' argument. We
> haven't called of_node_get() though, so we've put the node once
> without getting it first. Add the of_node_get() call so that
> things are properly balanced.
>
> Fixes: ef6a7bcfb01c ("usb: ulpi: Support device discovery via DT")
> Reported-by: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/usb/common/ulpi.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/common/ulpi.c b/drivers/usb/common/ulpi.c
> index 4aa5195db8ea..59e05eff76f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/common/ulpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/common/ulpi.c
> @@ -182,9 +182,9 @@ static int ulpi_of_register(struct ulpi *ulpi)
>
> /* Find a ulpi bus underneath the parent or the grandparent */
> parent = ulpi->dev.parent;
> - if (parent->of_node)
> + if (of_node_get(parent->of_node))
> np = of_find_node_by_name(parent->of_node, "ulpi");
> - else if (parent->parent && parent->parent->of_node)
> + else if (parent->parent && of_node_get(parent->parent->of_node))
> np = of_find_node_by_name(parent->parent->of_node, "ulpi");
I'm afraid this isn't the right fix; the code shouldn't have been using
of_find_node_by_name() in the first place as that function searches the
whole device tree depth-first starting at the parent (or grand parent),
which could end up matching an unrelated node.
of_get_child_by_name() is the helper to use for such lookups instead.
Turns out we have a few other driver with similar bugs. I've started
fixing a few of them that'll be sending out per subsystem.
I'll post a fix for this one as follow up to this mail meanwhile.
Thanks,
Johan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-11 15:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-11 1:43 [PATCH] usb: ulpi: Add missing of_node_get() in ulpi_of_register() Stephen Boyd
2017-11-11 15:25 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2017-11-11 15:31 ` [PATCH] USB: ulpi: fix bus-node lookup Johan Hovold
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171111152516.GN11226@localhost \
--to=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbrobinson@gmail.com \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox