From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753888AbdKMQmG (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Nov 2017 11:42:06 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f66.google.com ([74.125.82.66]:56577 "EHLO mail-wm0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753691AbdKMQmE (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Nov 2017 11:42:04 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMbvh7nnjIIfocJ2fQAFHa7w5d65qFtCUasMzblW+7nN4bm7jDzqzW7ivoKhOJp3XMkSqAuJlA== Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 19:41:54 +0300 From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Andy Lutomirski , Cyrill Gorcunov , Nicholas Piggin , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm: Do not allow non-MAP_FIXED mapping across DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW border Message-ID: <20171113164154.fp5fd2seozbmxcbs@node.shutemov.name> References: <20171107130539.52676-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 04:43:26PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Tue, 7 Nov 2017, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > > In case of 5-level paging, we don't put any mapping above 47-bit, unless > > userspace explicitly asked for it. > > > > Userspace can ask for allocation from full address space by specifying > > hint address above 47-bit. > > > > Nicholas noticed that current implementation violates this interface: > > we can get vma partly in high addresses if we ask for a mapping at very > > end of 47-bit address space. > > > > Let's make sure that, when consider hint address for non-MAP_FIXED > > mapping, start and end of resulting vma are on the same side of 47-bit > > border. > > What happens for mappings with MAP_FIXED which cross the border? It will succeed with 5-level paging. It should be safe as with 4-level paging such request would fail and it's reasonable to expect that userspace is not relying on the failure to function properly. -- Kirill A. Shutemov