* [PATCH] lib: Avoid redundant sizeof checking in __bitmap_weight() calculation.
@ 2017-11-14 6:57 Rakib Mullick
2017-11-14 7:23 ` Rasmus Villemoes
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rakib Mullick @ 2017-11-14 6:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Cc: Andrew Morton, Rasmus Villemoes, Matthew Wilcox, Yury Norov,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Currently, during __bitmap_weight() calculation hweight_long() is used.
Inside a hweight_long() a check has been made to figure out whether a
hweight32() or hweight64() version to use.
However, it's unnecessary to do it in case of __bitmap_weight() calculation
inside the loop. We can detect whether to use hweight32() or hweight64()
upfront and call respective function directly. It also reduces the
vmlinux size.
Before the patch:
text data bss dec hex filename
12901332 7798930 14541816 35242078 219c05e vmlinux
After the patch:
text data bss dec hex filename
12901331 7798930 14541816 35242077 219c05d vmlinux
Signed-off-by: Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Cc: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
---
Patch was created against torvald's tree (commit 43ff2f4db9d0f764).
lib/bitmap.c | 13 +++++++++----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/bitmap.c b/lib/bitmap.c
index d8f0c09..552096f 100644
--- a/lib/bitmap.c
+++ b/lib/bitmap.c
@@ -241,10 +241,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__bitmap_subset);
int __bitmap_weight(const unsigned long *bitmap, unsigned int bits)
{
unsigned int k, lim = bits/BITS_PER_LONG;
- int w = 0;
-
- for (k = 0; k < lim; k++)
- w += hweight_long(bitmap[k]);
+ int w = 0, is32 = sizeof(bitmap[0]) ? 1 : 0;
+
+ if (is32) {
+ for (k = 0; k < lim; k++)
+ w += hweight32(bitmap[k]);
+ } else {
+ for (k = 0; k < lim; k++)
+ w += hweight64(bitmap[k]);
+ }
if (bits % BITS_PER_LONG)
w += hweight_long(bitmap[k] & BITMAP_LAST_WORD_MASK(bits));
--
2.9.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] lib: Avoid redundant sizeof checking in __bitmap_weight() calculation.
2017-11-14 6:57 [PATCH] lib: Avoid redundant sizeof checking in __bitmap_weight() calculation Rakib Mullick
@ 2017-11-14 7:23 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2017-11-14 8:59 ` Rakib Mullick
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rasmus Villemoes @ 2017-11-14 7:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rakib Mullick
Cc: linux-kernel, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox, Yury Norov,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab
On 14 November 2017 at 07:57, Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@gmail.com> wrote:
> Currently, during __bitmap_weight() calculation hweight_long() is used.
> Inside a hweight_long() a check has been made to figure out whether a
> hweight32() or hweight64() version to use.
>
> diff --git a/lib/bitmap.c b/lib/bitmap.c
> index d8f0c09..552096f 100644
> --- a/lib/bitmap.c
> +++ b/lib/bitmap.c
> @@ -241,10 +241,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__bitmap_subset);
> int __bitmap_weight(const unsigned long *bitmap, unsigned int bits)
> {
> unsigned int k, lim = bits/BITS_PER_LONG;
> - int w = 0;
> -
> - for (k = 0; k < lim; k++)
> - w += hweight_long(bitmap[k]);
> + int w = 0, is32 = sizeof(bitmap[0]) ? 1 : 0;
> +
hint: sizeof() very rarely evaluates to zero... So this is the same as
"is32 = 1". So the patch as-is is broken (and may explain the 1-byte
delta in vmlinux). But even if this condition is fixed, the patch
doesn't change anything, since the sizeof() evaluation is done at
compile-time, regardless of whether it happens inside the inlined
hweight_long or outside. So it is certainly not worth it to duplicate
the loop.
Rasmus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] lib: Avoid redundant sizeof checking in __bitmap_weight() calculation.
2017-11-14 7:23 ` Rasmus Villemoes
@ 2017-11-14 8:59 ` Rakib Mullick
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rakib Mullick @ 2017-11-14 8:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rasmus Villemoes
Cc: LKML, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox, Yury Norov,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Rasmus Villemoes
<linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> wrote:
>
> hint: sizeof() very rarely evaluates to zero... So this is the same as
> "is32 = 1". So the patch as-is is broken (and may explain the 1-byte
> delta in vmlinux). But even if this condition is fixed, the patch
> doesn't change anything, since the sizeof() evaluation is done at
> compile-time, regardless of whether it happens inside the inlined
> hweight_long or outside. So it is certainly not worth it to duplicate
> the loop.
>
Right, no need to duplicate the loop. Checking the objdump output, it
didn't changed anything at all. Fixed condition nullifies the vmlinux
size advantage also. Drop it.
Thanks,
Rakib.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-11-14 8:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-11-14 6:57 [PATCH] lib: Avoid redundant sizeof checking in __bitmap_weight() calculation Rakib Mullick
2017-11-14 7:23 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2017-11-14 8:59 ` Rakib Mullick
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox