From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753733AbdKNH40 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Nov 2017 02:56:26 -0500 Received: from smtprelay02.ispgateway.de ([80.67.18.14]:63000 "EHLO smtprelay02.ispgateway.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751848AbdKNH4Y (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Nov 2017 02:56:24 -0500 Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 08:56:16 +0100 From: Lothar =?UTF-8?B?V2HDn21hbm4=?= To: Enric Balletbo i Serra Cc: Daniel Thompson , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Jacek Anaszewski , Jingoo Han , Lee Jones , Mark Rutland , Pavel Machek , Richard Purdie , Rob Herring , Thierry Reding , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] backlight: pwm_bl: prevent backlight flicker when switching PWM on Message-ID: <20171114085616.3dfe6f03@karo-electronics.de> In-Reply-To: <8682e9c4-518d-5dce-55c5-c221dddd5fd6@collabora.com> References: <1509022186-19636-1-git-send-email-LW@KARO-electronics.de> <1509022186-19636-2-git-send-email-LW@KARO-electronics.de> <8682e9c4-518d-5dce-55c5-c221dddd5fd6@collabora.com> Organization: Ka-Ro electronics GmbH MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Df-Sender: bHdAa2Fyby1lbGVjdHJvbmljcy5kZQ== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 12:22:15 +0100 Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote: > Hi all, > > On 08/11/17 11:48, Daniel Thompson wrote: > > On 26/10/17 13:49, Lothar Waßmann wrote: > >> These patches implement some measures to prevent backlight flicker > >> when the backlight is being switched on for a display with an active > >> low brightness control pin. > >> GIT: [PATCH 1/2] backlight: pwm_bl: Enable PWM before switching regulator > >> GIT: [PATCH 2/2] backlight: pwm_bl: add configurable delay between > > > > Other than hoisting the pwm_enable() even earlier in the setup sequence this > > patchset seems to have a significant overlap with Enric's recent posting: > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/7/21/211 > > > > Any chance of a shared view on this, especially on the DT bindings? > > > > The DT binding were discussed some time ago for the patch series I sent, though > there isn't a final ack from DT maintainer. > > Lothar, the series I sent have been reviewed and acked, can you test if the > series fixes the problem for you too? > I'll try to test it within the next couple of days and will report back. Lothar Waßmann