public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Piotr Luc <piotr.luc@intel.com>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	He Chen <he.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 0/3] Fix panic in logical packages calculation
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 07:42:54 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171114124257.22013-1-prarit@redhat.com> (raw)

A system booted with a small number of cores enabled per package
panics because the estimate of __max_logical_packages is too low.
This occurs when the total number of active cores across all packages
is less than the maximum core count for a single package.

Andi noted that the logical_packages calculation wastes 128k on 64-bit
x86 systems and posted patches to fix the allocation.  His patches
result in significant memory size savings, and I have put my
fix on top of those patches.

Here's an example of the panic:

     smpboot: Booting Node   1, Processors  #1 OK
     smpboot: Package 1 of CPU 1 exceeds BIOS package data 1.
     ------------[ cut here ]------------
     kernel BUG at arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c:1087!
     invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
     Modules linked in:
     CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 4.14.0-rc2+ #4

This was tested by dropping the number of active cores across
all packages to reproduce the bug above.  Additional testing included
2 socket and 4 socket systems and hotplugging entire sockets in different
order.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Piotr Luc <piotr.luc@intel.com>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Cc: He Chen <he.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>

Andi Kleen (2):
  perf/x86/intel/uncore: Cache logical pkg id in uncore driver
  x86/topology: Avoid wasting 128k for package id array

Prarit Bhargava (1):
  x86/smpboot: Fix __max_logical_packages estimate

 arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c       |   4 +-
 arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h       |   2 +-
 arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c |   2 +-
 arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h     |   1 +
 arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c            | 130 +++++++++++------------------------
 5 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 95 deletions(-)

-- 
2.15.0.rc0.39.g2f0e14e64

             reply	other threads:[~2017-11-14 12:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-14 12:42 Prarit Bhargava [this message]
2017-11-14 12:42 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Cache logical pkg id in uncore driver Prarit Bhargava
2017-11-17 15:27   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Andi Kleen
2017-11-14 12:42 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] x86/topology: Avoid wasting 128k for package id array Prarit Bhargava
2017-11-17 14:59   ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-17 15:27   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Andi Kleen
2017-11-14 12:42 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] x86/smpboot: Fix __max_logical_packages estimate Prarit Bhargava
2017-11-17 15:27   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Prarit Bhargava
2018-02-07 18:44   ` [v6,3/3] " Simon Gaiser
2018-02-07 19:04     ` Prarit Bhargava
2018-02-07 19:26       ` Simon Gaiser
2018-02-07 19:31         ` Prarit Bhargava

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171114124257.22013-1-prarit@redhat.com \
    --to=prarit@redhat.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=he.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=minipli@googlemail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=piotr.luc@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox