public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	leedom@chelsio.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Harsh@chelsio.com, jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d: Fix scatterlist offset handling
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 15:54:56 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171115155456.141a6dc8@jacob-builder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171106104709.06b38f7c@jacob-builder>

Hi Alex and all,

Just wondering if you could merge Robin's patch for the next rc. From
all our testing, this seems to be a solid fix and should be included in
the stable releases as well.

Thanks,

Jacob

On Mon, 6 Nov 2017 10:47:09 -0800
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 16:43:09 +0200
> Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 07:05:17PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:  
> > > Now, there are indeed plenty of drivers and subsystems which do
> > > work on lists of explicitly single pages - anything doing some
> > > variant of "addr = kmap_atomic(sg_page(sg)) + sg->offset;" is easy
> > > to spot - but I don't think DMA API implementations are in a
> > > position to make any kind of assumption; nearly all of them just
> > > shut up and handle sg->length bytes from sg_phys(sg) without
> > > questioning the caller, and I reckon that's exactly what they
> > > should be doing.    
> > 
> > I agree with that, it is not explicitly forbidden to have an
> > sg->offset > PAGE_SIZE and most IOMMU drivers handle this case.
> > 
> > So this is a problem I'd like to see resolved in the VT-d driver
> > too. If nobody comes up with a correct fix soon I'll apply this one
> > and rip out the large-page support from __domain_mapping() to make
> > it work.
> >   
> Hi All,
> 
> Just to give an update on the offline debugging of this issue. With
> Robin's patch applied, I was able to reproduce the failure with
> similar configuration that Jain helped to set up.
> 
> I added trace prints just to see the map/unmap activities leading to
> the DMAR fault. When fault occurs, the trace shows there is an unmap
> to the offending iova pfn. So I think this is a separate problem than
> Robin's patch is fixing. I think we should move forward to merge this
> patch upstream and stable. The remaining problem is likely a race
> condition between unmap and DMA activities.
> 
> Here a brief extracted log, ee3d7 is the iova pfn in question.
> #1. map sg pfn ee3d7
>           <idle>-0     [076] 74124.154254: bprint:
> __domain_mapping: vpfn:ee3d7, pgoff=2126, np:1, da:ee3d784e,
> len:1464 ,
> ppfn:1849c9c                                                                                                                        
> 
> #2. unmap ee3d7000
>          <idle>-0     [054] 74124.154301: bprint:
> intel_unmap: Device 0000:18:00.4 unmapping: pfn ee3d7-ee3d7
> <idle>-0     [076] 74124.154301: bprint:
> __domain_mapping: lvlpg:1, nrpg 0, vpfn:ec2ff, ppfn:183221a, sg_res:0
> <idle>-0     [059] 74124.154302: bprint:
> __domain_mapping: lvlpg:1, nrpg 0, vpfn:ee719, ppfn:c3e4dd, sg_res:0
> <idle>-0     [076] 74124.154302: bprint:
> __domain_mapping: vpfn:f183b, pgoff=78, np:1, da:f183b04e, len:1464, 
> 
> #3. DMA to unmapped address ee3d7000, DMAR fault raised.
>   +2.952861] dmar_fault: 6 callbacks
> suppressed +0.000002] DMAR: DRHD: handling fault status reg
> 2 +0.005588] turning tracing
> off +0.003592] DMAR: [DMA Write] Request device [18:00.4] fault addr
> ee3d7000 [fault reason 05] PTE Write access is not set 
>                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
>          <idle>-0     [000] 74124.156906: bputs:
>          0xffffffffb259916bs: turning tracing off     
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jacob
> 
> > Speaking of __domain_mapping(), this function is a big
> > unmaintainable mess which should be split and rewritten. A clean
> > and maintainable rewrite can alse re-add the large-page support.
> > 
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > 	Joerg
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > iommu mailing list
> > iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
> > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu  
> 
> [Jacob Pan]

[Jacob Pan]

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-15 23:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-28 14:14 [PATCH] iommu/vt-d: Fix scatterlist offset handling Robin Murphy
2017-09-28 16:17 ` Casey Leedom
2017-09-28 13:29   ` Raj, Ashok
2017-09-28 16:59     ` Robin Murphy
2017-09-28 15:43       ` Raj, Ashok
2017-10-03 19:36         ` Raj, Ashok
2017-09-29  8:14 ` Harsh Jain
2017-09-29 16:18   ` Casey Leedom
     [not found]     ` <e2c92d3a-3d5d-a0eb-7d5f-a9453e48cfd5@chelsio.com>
2017-10-03 22:22       ` Casey Leedom
2017-10-03 12:55 ` David Woodhouse
2017-10-03 18:05   ` Robin Murphy
2017-10-03 22:16     ` David Woodhouse
2017-10-04 11:18       ` Robin Murphy
2017-10-06 14:43     ` Joerg Roedel
2017-10-06 12:54       ` Raj, Ashok
2017-11-06 18:47       ` Jacob Pan
2017-11-15 23:54         ` Jacob Pan [this message]
2017-11-16 21:32           ` Alex Williamson
2017-11-16 21:09             ` Raj, Ashok
2017-11-17 16:18               ` Alex Williamson
2017-11-17 15:48                 ` Raj, Ashok
2017-11-17 17:44                   ` Casey Leedom
2017-11-17 18:09                     ` Jacob Pan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171115155456.141a6dc8@jacob-builder \
    --to=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Harsh@chelsio.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=leedom@chelsio.com \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox