From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Martin Kepplinger <martink@posteo.de>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, corbet@lwn.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] samples: replace outdated permission statement with SPDX identifiers
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 12:41:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171116114110.GA5892@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171115204411.10292-1-martink@posteo.de>
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 09:44:11PM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
> This replaces license permission statements that include a wrong postal
> address of the FSF with only SPDX license identifiers; in the samples
> directory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Kepplinger <martink@posteo.de>
> ---
>
> I'll fold this in, in the thread here. I guess this change is what Greg
> had in mind? Or would you prefer having including SPDX and removing
> permission statement seperately?
I have been doing them in 2 steps, but only because the files I modified
were in different "chunks" (i.e. add missing SPDX identifiers to a bunch
of files in a directory, and then the second patch would remove the
license identifiers for all files in that directory). As that type of
patch flow doesn't make sense here, I think what you did was just fine.
Nice job.
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-16 11:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-14 9:50 [PATCH] samples: replace FSF address with web source in license notices Martin Kepplinger
2017-11-15 6:29 ` Greg KH
2017-11-15 7:46 ` Martin Kepplinger
2017-11-15 8:45 ` Greg KH
2017-11-15 20:44 ` [PATCH] samples: replace outdated permission statement with SPDX identifiers Martin Kepplinger
2017-11-16 11:41 ` Greg KH [this message]
2017-11-17 22:53 ` Jonathan Corbet
2017-11-17 23:43 ` Martin Kepplinger
2017-11-18 0:13 ` Jonathan Corbet
2017-11-18 8:33 ` Martin Kepplinger
2017-11-18 10:20 ` Greg KH
2017-11-18 10:17 ` Greg KH
2017-11-18 11:21 ` Martin Kepplinger
2017-11-16 13:56 ` Philippe Ombredanne
2017-11-22 22:23 ` [PATCH] samples: replace FSF address with web source in license notices Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171116114110.GA5892@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martink@posteo.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox