linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>,
	Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>,
	Pawel Osciak <pawel@osciak.com>,
	Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@chromium.org>,
	Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi>,
	Brian Starkey <brian.starkey@arm.com>,
	Thierry Escande <thierry.escande@collabora.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v5 03/11] [media] vb2: add 'ordered_in_driver' property to queues
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 10:27:10 -0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171117122710.GF19033@jade> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171117101559.455cced3@vento.lan>

Hi Mauro,

2017-11-17 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>:

> Em Wed, 15 Nov 2017 15:10:49 -0200
> Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org> escreveu:
> 
> > From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.com>
> > 
> > We use ordered_in_driver property to optimize for the case where
> > the driver can deliver the buffers in an ordered fashion. When it
> > is ordered we can use the same fence context for all fences, but
> > when it is not we need to a new context for each out-fence.
> > 
> > So the ordered_in_driver flag will help us with identifying the queues
> > that can be optimized and use the same fence context.
> > 
> > v4: make the property a vector for optimization and not a mandatory thing
> > that drivers need to set if they want to use explicit synchronization.
> > 
> > v3: improve doc (Hans Verkuil)
> > 
> > v2: rename property to 'ordered_in_driver' to avoid confusion
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.com>
> > ---
> >  include/media/videobuf2-core.h | 7 +++++++
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/media/videobuf2-core.h b/include/media/videobuf2-core.h
> > index ef9b64398c8c..38b9c8dd42c6 100644
> > --- a/include/media/videobuf2-core.h
> > +++ b/include/media/videobuf2-core.h
> > @@ -440,6 +440,12 @@ struct vb2_buf_ops {
> >   * @fileio_read_once:		report EOF after reading the first buffer
> >   * @fileio_write_immediately:	queue buffer after each write() call
> >   * @allow_zero_bytesused:	allow bytesused == 0 to be passed to the driver
> > + * @ordered_in_driver: if the driver can guarantee that the queue will be
> > + *		ordered or not, i.e., the buffers are dequeued from the driver
> > + *		in the same order they are queued to the driver. The default
> > + *		is not ordered unless the driver sets this flag. Setting it
> > + *		when ordering can be guaranted helps to optimize explicit
> > + *		fences.
> >   * @quirk_poll_must_check_waiting_for_buffers: Return POLLERR at poll when QBUF
> >   *              has not been called. This is a vb1 idiom that has been adopted
> >   *              also by vb2.
> > @@ -510,6 +516,7 @@ struct vb2_queue {
> >  	unsigned			fileio_read_once:1;
> >  	unsigned			fileio_write_immediately:1;
> >  	unsigned			allow_zero_bytesused:1;
> > +	unsigned			ordered_in_driver:1;
> 
> As this may depend on the format, it is probably a good idea to set
> this flag either via a function argument or by a function that
> would be meant to update it, as video format changes.

Right, and maybe I can find a way to store this in only one place,
istead of what I did here (having to set explicitely both the 
ordered_in_driver and the flag separatedly)

Gustavo

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-17 12:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-15 17:10 [RFC v5 00/11] V4L2 Explicit Synchronization Gustavo Padovan
2017-11-15 17:10 ` [RFC v5 01/11] [media] v4l: add V4L2_CAP_ORDERED to the uapi Gustavo Padovan
2017-11-17 11:57   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2017-11-17 12:23     ` Gustavo Padovan
2017-11-15 17:10 ` [RFC v5 02/11] [media] vivid: add the V4L2_CAP_ORDERED capability Gustavo Padovan
2017-11-15 17:10 ` [RFC v5 03/11] [media] vb2: add 'ordered_in_driver' property to queues Gustavo Padovan
2017-11-17  5:56   ` Alexandre Courbot
2017-11-17 11:23     ` Gustavo Padovan
2017-11-17 12:15   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2017-11-17 12:27     ` Gustavo Padovan [this message]
2017-11-15 17:10 ` [RFC v5 04/11] [media] vivid: mark vivid queues as ordered_in_driver Gustavo Padovan
2017-11-15 17:10 ` [RFC v5 05/11] [media] vb2: check earlier if stream can be started Gustavo Padovan
2017-11-15 17:10 ` [RFC v5 06/11] [media] vb2: add explicit fence user API Gustavo Padovan
2017-11-17 12:25   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2017-11-17 13:29   ` Hans Verkuil
2017-11-17 13:53     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2017-11-17 14:31       ` Hans Verkuil
2017-11-15 17:10 ` [RFC v5 07/11] [media] vb2: add in-fence support to QBUF Gustavo Padovan
2017-11-17  6:49   ` Alexandre Courbot
2017-11-17 13:00     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2017-11-17 13:08       ` Gustavo Padovan
2017-11-17 13:19         ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2017-11-20 11:41           ` Brian Starkey
2017-11-17 13:01     ` Gustavo Padovan
2017-11-20  2:53       ` Alexandre Courbot
2017-11-17 12:53   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2017-11-17 13:12     ` Gustavo Padovan
2017-11-17 13:47       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2017-11-17 17:20         ` Gustavo Padovan
2017-11-17 14:15   ` Hans Verkuil
2017-11-17 17:40     ` Gustavo Padovan
2017-11-17 17:50       ` Gustavo Padovan
2017-11-18  9:30       ` Hans Verkuil
2017-11-15 17:10 ` [RFC v5 08/11] [media] vb2: add videobuf2 dma-buf fence helpers Gustavo Padovan
2017-11-17  7:02   ` Alexandre Courbot
2017-11-17  7:11     ` Alexandre Courbot
2017-11-17 11:27       ` Gustavo Padovan
2017-11-15 17:10 ` [RFC v5 09/11] [media] vb2: add infrastructure to support out-fences Gustavo Padovan
2017-11-17  7:19   ` Alexandre Courbot
2017-11-17  7:29     ` Alexandre Courbot
2017-11-17 11:30     ` Gustavo Padovan
2017-11-15 17:10 ` [RFC v5 10/11] [media] vb2: add out-fence support to QBUF Gustavo Padovan
2017-11-17  7:38   ` Alexandre Courbot
2017-11-17 11:48     ` Gustavo Padovan
2017-11-17 13:34   ` Hans Verkuil
2017-11-15 17:10 ` [RFC v5 11/11] [media] v4l: Document explicit synchronization behavior Gustavo Padovan
2017-11-20 10:19 ` [RFC v5 00/11] V4L2 Explicit Synchronization Smitha T Murthy
2017-11-30 18:53   ` Gustavo Padovan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171117122710.GF19033@jade \
    --to=gustavo@padovan.org \
    --cc=acourbot@chromium.org \
    --cc=brian.starkey@arm.com \
    --cc=gustavo.padovan@collabora.com \
    --cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@osg.samsung.com \
    --cc=pawel@osciak.com \
    --cc=sakari.ailus@iki.fi \
    --cc=shuahkh@osg.samsung.com \
    --cc=thierry.escande@collabora.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).