The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rdma: Add Jason as a co-maintainer
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 14:32:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171117213227.GQ4276@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1510947901.3973.26.camel@redhat.com>

On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 02:45:01PM -0500, Doug Ledford wrote:

> On that point...I have my github repo tied into the 0day infrastructure,
> not the official repo.  I do that because I've publicly announced that
> my github repo is a WIP repo, and that it might be rebased.  That allows
> me to correct build issues by fixing up the broken patch and thereby
> keep bisectability at its highest.  If you use a branch/tag on k.o for
> your 0day testing, then fixes have to be incremental and depending on
> which patch broke the build, there might be a significant segment of
> code that is no longer bisectable.

.. and this is because the k.o repo is setup to disallow force push
for each branch, so a 0 day testing branch cannot be rebased?

> > Doug will send Stephen Rothwell a note to move his for-next pull for
> > RDMA from Doug's personal directory to:
> > 
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rdma/rdma.git
> > 
> > Branch k.o/for-next
> 
> Actually, the linux-next testing uses a tag instead of a branch.  That
> allows for oddball scenarios that you might want to get testing.  Say,
> for instance, that you have a for-next branch with most of your stuff,
> but you also have a separate branch that simply isn't ready to be pushed
> yet, but you still want to get some early merge analysis, then you
> create a throwaway branch, merge your for-next and this topic branch
> together, throw the for-next tag on it for a couple or three days, and
> if Stephen doesn't find anything, you're on the right path with your
> development code.  Then you just reset the tag prior to pushing to
> Linus.

Makes sense, this is why I said you'll send the note, because you know
how it is setup :)

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-17 21:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-16 20:44 [PATCH] rdma: Add Jason as a co-maintainer Jason Gunthorpe
2017-11-17  5:00 ` Leon Romanovsky
2017-11-17 17:54 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-11-17 18:14   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-11-17 19:45     ` Doug Ledford
2017-11-17 21:32       ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2017-11-18  1:44         ` Doug Ledford
2017-11-18  7:26           ` Leon Romanovsky
2017-11-19  8:33   ` Amrani, Ram
2017-11-20 12:45 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-11-20 16:10 ` Leon Romanovsky
2017-11-20 18:06   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-11-21  5:04     ` Leon Romanovsky
2017-11-21  6:37       ` Leon Romanovsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171117213227.GQ4276@ziepe.ca \
    --to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox