From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751068AbdKSLUv (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Nov 2017 06:20:51 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:43066 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750814AbdKSLUr (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Nov 2017 06:20:47 -0500 Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2017 12:20:51 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Tom Gall Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux- stable , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, shuahkh@osg.samsung.com, Guenter Roeck , ltp@lists.linux.it, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Towards 4.14 LTS Message-ID: <20171119112051.GA10015@kroah.com> References: <5E1947BC-9D22-42EB-BA29-96EA15A9C817@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <5E1947BC-9D22-42EB-BA29-96EA15A9C817@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 10:50:23PM -0600, Tom Gall wrote: > At Linaro we’ve been putting effort into regularly running kernel tests over > arm, arm64 and x86_64 targets. On those targets we’re running mainline, -next, > 4.4, and 4.9 kernels and yes we are adding to this list as the hardware > capacity grows. > > For test buckets we’re using just LTP, kselftest and libhugetlbfs and > like kernels we will add to this list. I'm sorry, I don't understand this sentance. > With the 4.14 cycle being a little ‘different’ in so much as the goal to > have it be an LTS kernel I think it’s important to take a look at some > 4.14 test results. > > Grab a beverage, this is a bit of a long post. But quick summery 4.14 as > released looks just as good as 4.13, for the test buckets I named above. Thanks for doing this testing and letting us know. greg k-h