From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752011AbdKVTKP (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Nov 2017 14:10:15 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:55156 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751773AbdKVTKO (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Nov 2017 14:10:14 -0500 Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 19:10:14 +0000 From: Will Deacon To: Sebastian Ott Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Martin Schwidefsky , Heiko Carstens , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [bisected] system hang after boot Message-ID: <20171122191013.GF22648@arm.com> References: <20171122182659.GA22648@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Sebastian, On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 07:54:54PM +0100, Sebastian Ott wrote: > On Wed, 22 Nov 2017, Will Deacon wrote: > > Now, I can't see what the break_lock is doing here other than causing > > problems. Is there a good reason for it, or can you just try removing it > > altogether? Patch below. > > With your patch applied the system is able to boot again. > I did some quick additional tests - seems to be working fine. That was quick, thanks! So the million dollar question is: does somebody care about the break_lock field and, if so, why? Will