From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751910AbdKYSB5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Nov 2017 13:01:57 -0500 Received: from mga07.intel.com ([134.134.136.100]:29768 "EHLO mga07.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751590AbdKYSB4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Nov 2017 13:01:56 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.44,454,1505804400"; d="scan'208";a="153176747" Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2017 20:01:50 +0200 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: Darren Hart Cc: intel-sgx-kernel-dev@lists.01.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/11] intel_sgx: glue code for in-kernel LE Message-ID: <20171125180150.urpvh3tooophagpw@linux.intel.com> References: <20171117230705.GE25974@fury> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171117230705.GE25974@fury> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 03:07:05PM -0800, Darren Hart wrote: > No incremental cleanup here - appears to all be handled through > sgx_le_stop - do I have that right? Yes. This is correct. /Jarkko