From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Gimcuan Hui <gimcuan@gmail.com>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: serial: Correct return value on read
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 11:21:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171127102115.GB9862@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171126161851.25650-1-gimcuan@gmail.com>
On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 04:18:51PM +0000, Gimcuan Hui wrote:
> It's meaningless to return buf[0] on read. Because the caller of this
> interface checks the return value negative or not. Instead, we should
> return the result variable.
It's not really meaningless, it's just that the return value is no
longer being used the way it was originally intended. I think
"redundant" and/or "confusing" would be a more appropriate description.
> Signed-off-by: Gimcuan Hui <gimcuan@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/serial/ark3116.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/ark3116.c b/drivers/usb/serial/ark3116.c
> index 3c544782f60b..bfdbc7164e7b 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/serial/ark3116.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/serial/ark3116.c
> @@ -101,11 +101,9 @@ static int ark3116_read_reg(struct usb_serial *serial,
> reg, result);
> if (result >= 0)
> result = -EIO;
> -
> - return result;
> }
>
> - return buf[0];
> + return result;
Also we do not want to return the value of result on success as that
would always be 1 (i.e. the buffer size).
You could change this function, and also the write_reg one, to return 0
on success since this is a more common pattern.
Please also rephrase your commit summary (Subject) since you're not
really "correcting" (as in fixing) anything here. This is more a of nice
clean up, even if it could potentially also prevent future bugs.
Thanks,
Johan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-27 10:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-26 16:18 [PATCH] USB: serial: Correct return value on read Gimcuan Hui
2017-11-27 10:21 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2017-11-27 14:21 ` saks cuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171127102115.GB9862@localhost \
--to=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=gimcuan@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox