* [RESEND PATCH] irq_work: improve the flag definitions
@ 2017-11-27 10:52 Bartosz Golaszewski
2017-11-27 15:49 ` Andy Shevchenko
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Bartosz Golaszewski @ 2017-11-27 10:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner, Marc Zyngier; +Cc: linux-kernel, Bartosz Golaszewski
IRQ_WORK_FLAGS is defined simply to 3UL. This is confusing as it
says nothing about its purpose. Define IRQ_WORK_FLAGS as a bitwise
OR of IRQ_WORK_PENDING and IRQ_WORK_BUSY and change its name to
IRQ_WORK_CLAIMED.
While we're at it: use the BIT() macro for all flags.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
---
include/linux/irq_work.h | 8 ++++----
kernel/irq_work.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/irq_work.h b/include/linux/irq_work.h
index 0e81035b678f..de6333967d61 100644
--- a/include/linux/irq_work.h
+++ b/include/linux/irq_work.h
@@ -13,10 +13,10 @@
* busy NULL, 2 -> {free, claimed} : callback in progress, can be claimed
*/
-#define IRQ_WORK_PENDING 1UL
-#define IRQ_WORK_BUSY 2UL
-#define IRQ_WORK_FLAGS 3UL
-#define IRQ_WORK_LAZY 4UL /* Doesn't want IPI, wait for tick */
+#define IRQ_WORK_PENDING BIT(0)
+#define IRQ_WORK_BUSY BIT(1)
+#define IRQ_WORK_CLAIMED (IRQ_WORK_PENDING | IRQ_WORK_BUSY)
+#define IRQ_WORK_LAZY BIT(2) /* Doesn't want IPI, wait for tick */
struct irq_work {
unsigned long flags;
diff --git a/kernel/irq_work.c b/kernel/irq_work.c
index 40e9d739c169..6b7cdf17ccf8 100644
--- a/kernel/irq_work.c
+++ b/kernel/irq_work.c
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ static bool irq_work_claim(struct irq_work *work)
*/
flags = work->flags & ~IRQ_WORK_PENDING;
for (;;) {
- nflags = flags | IRQ_WORK_FLAGS;
+ nflags = flags | IRQ_WORK_CLAIMED;
oflags = cmpxchg(&work->flags, flags, nflags);
if (oflags == flags)
break;
--
2.15.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [RESEND PATCH] irq_work: improve the flag definitions
2017-11-27 10:52 [RESEND PATCH] irq_work: improve the flag definitions Bartosz Golaszewski
@ 2017-11-27 15:49 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-12-11 10:59 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2017-12-11 14:52 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2017-11-27 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bartosz Golaszewski
Cc: Thomas Gleixner, Marc Zyngier, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote:
> IRQ_WORK_FLAGS is defined simply to 3UL. This is confusing as it
> says nothing about its purpose. Define IRQ_WORK_FLAGS as a bitwise
> OR of IRQ_WORK_PENDING and IRQ_WORK_BUSY and change its name to
> IRQ_WORK_CLAIMED.
>
> While we're at it: use the BIT() macro for all flags.
>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
> ---
> include/linux/irq_work.h | 8 ++++----
> kernel/irq_work.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/irq_work.h b/include/linux/irq_work.h
> index 0e81035b678f..de6333967d61 100644
> --- a/include/linux/irq_work.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irq_work.h
> @@ -13,10 +13,10 @@
> * busy NULL, 2 -> {free, claimed} : callback in progress, can be claimed
> */
>
> -#define IRQ_WORK_PENDING 1UL
> -#define IRQ_WORK_BUSY 2UL
> -#define IRQ_WORK_FLAGS 3UL
> -#define IRQ_WORK_LAZY 4UL /* Doesn't want IPI, wait for tick */
> +#define IRQ_WORK_PENDING BIT(0)
> +#define IRQ_WORK_BUSY BIT(1)
> +#define IRQ_WORK_CLAIMED (IRQ_WORK_PENDING | IRQ_WORK_BUSY)
> +#define IRQ_WORK_LAZY BIT(2) /* Doesn't want IPI, wait for tick */
>
> struct irq_work {
> unsigned long flags;
> diff --git a/kernel/irq_work.c b/kernel/irq_work.c
> index 40e9d739c169..6b7cdf17ccf8 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq_work.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq_work.c
> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ static bool irq_work_claim(struct irq_work *work)
> */
> flags = work->flags & ~IRQ_WORK_PENDING;
> for (;;) {
> - nflags = flags | IRQ_WORK_FLAGS;
> + nflags = flags | IRQ_WORK_CLAIMED;
> oflags = cmpxchg(&work->flags, flags, nflags);
> if (oflags == flags)
> break;
> --
> 2.15.0
>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [RESEND PATCH] irq_work: improve the flag definitions
2017-11-27 10:52 [RESEND PATCH] irq_work: improve the flag definitions Bartosz Golaszewski
2017-11-27 15:49 ` Andy Shevchenko
@ 2017-12-11 10:59 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2017-12-11 14:53 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-12-11 14:52 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Bartosz Golaszewski @ 2017-12-11 10:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner, Marc Zyngier, Frederic Weisbecker
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Bartosz Golaszewski
2017-11-27 11:52 GMT+01:00 Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>:
> IRQ_WORK_FLAGS is defined simply to 3UL. This is confusing as it
> says nothing about its purpose. Define IRQ_WORK_FLAGS as a bitwise
> OR of IRQ_WORK_PENDING and IRQ_WORK_BUSY and change its name to
> IRQ_WORK_CLAIMED.
>
> While we're at it: use the BIT() macro for all flags.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
> ---
> include/linux/irq_work.h | 8 ++++----
> kernel/irq_work.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/irq_work.h b/include/linux/irq_work.h
> index 0e81035b678f..de6333967d61 100644
> --- a/include/linux/irq_work.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irq_work.h
> @@ -13,10 +13,10 @@
> * busy NULL, 2 -> {free, claimed} : callback in progress, can be claimed
> */
>
> -#define IRQ_WORK_PENDING 1UL
> -#define IRQ_WORK_BUSY 2UL
> -#define IRQ_WORK_FLAGS 3UL
> -#define IRQ_WORK_LAZY 4UL /* Doesn't want IPI, wait for tick */
> +#define IRQ_WORK_PENDING BIT(0)
> +#define IRQ_WORK_BUSY BIT(1)
> +#define IRQ_WORK_CLAIMED (IRQ_WORK_PENDING | IRQ_WORK_BUSY)
> +#define IRQ_WORK_LAZY BIT(2) /* Doesn't want IPI, wait for tick */
>
> struct irq_work {
> unsigned long flags;
> diff --git a/kernel/irq_work.c b/kernel/irq_work.c
> index 40e9d739c169..6b7cdf17ccf8 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq_work.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq_work.c
> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ static bool irq_work_claim(struct irq_work *work)
> */
> flags = work->flags & ~IRQ_WORK_PENDING;
> for (;;) {
> - nflags = flags | IRQ_WORK_FLAGS;
> + nflags = flags | IRQ_WORK_CLAIMED;
> oflags = cmpxchg(&work->flags, flags, nflags);
> if (oflags == flags)
> break;
> --
> 2.15.0
>
It's been a couple months since I first posted this patch. Can it be
applied for 4.16?
@Frederic: I noticed you picked up some irq_work patches in the past
so I'm Cc'ing you.
Best regards,
Bartosz Golaszewski
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [RESEND PATCH] irq_work: improve the flag definitions
2017-11-27 10:52 [RESEND PATCH] irq_work: improve the flag definitions Bartosz Golaszewski
2017-11-27 15:49 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-12-11 10:59 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
@ 2017-12-11 14:52 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Frederic Weisbecker @ 2017-12-11 14:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bartosz Golaszewski; +Cc: Thomas Gleixner, Marc Zyngier, linux-kernel
2017-11-27 11:52 UTC+01:00, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>:
> IRQ_WORK_FLAGS is defined simply to 3UL. This is confusing as it
> says nothing about its purpose. Define IRQ_WORK_FLAGS as a bitwise
> OR of IRQ_WORK_PENDING and IRQ_WORK_BUSY and change its name to
> IRQ_WORK_CLAIMED.
>
> While we're at it: use the BIT() macro for all flags.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Nice!
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [RESEND PATCH] irq_work: improve the flag definitions
2017-12-11 10:59 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
@ 2017-12-11 14:53 ` Frederic Weisbecker
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Frederic Weisbecker @ 2017-12-11 14:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bartosz Golaszewski
Cc: Thomas Gleixner, Marc Zyngier, Linux Kernel Mailing List
2017-12-11 11:59 UTC+01:00, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>:
> 2017-11-27 11:52 GMT+01:00 Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>:
> It's been a couple months since I first posted this patch. Can it be
> applied for 4.16?
>
> @Frederic: I noticed you picked up some irq_work patches in the past
> so I'm Cc'ing you.
Sure, I'll take it!
Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-12-11 14:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-11-27 10:52 [RESEND PATCH] irq_work: improve the flag definitions Bartosz Golaszewski
2017-11-27 15:49 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-12-11 10:59 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2017-12-11 14:53 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-12-11 14:52 ` Frederic Weisbecker
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox