From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752311AbdK0Nug (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Nov 2017 08:50:36 -0500 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:35890 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751754AbdK0Nuf (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Nov 2017 08:50:35 -0500 Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 14:50:32 +0100 From: Andrew Lunn To: Richard Leitner Cc: f.fainelli@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, richard.leitner@skidata.com Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] net: phy: harmonize phy_id{,_mask} data type Message-ID: <20171127135032.GF19413@lunn.ch> References: <20171127071645.27077-1-dev@g0hl1n.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171127071645.27077-1-dev@g0hl1n.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 08:16:45AM +0100, Richard Leitner wrote: > From: Richard Leitner > > Previously phy_id was u32 and phy_id_mask was unsigned int. As the > phy_id_mask defines the important bits of the phy_id (and is therefore > the same size) these two variables should be the same data type. Hi Richard It is normal to put inside the [] of the subject line which of the two trees this patch is for. In this case net-next. No need to resend, but please try to do this for your the next networking patch. Andrew