From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753072AbdK1TIc (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Nov 2017 14:08:32 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:53542 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751867AbdK1TIb (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Nov 2017 14:08:31 -0500 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 163A421912 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=leon@kernel.org Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 21:08:26 +0200 From: Leon Romanovsky To: Bart Van Assche Cc: "jgg@ziepe.ca" , "dennis.dalessandro@intel.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" , "xavier_huwei@163.com" , "linuxarm@huawei.com" , "xavier.huwei@huawei.com" , "xavier.huwei@tom.com" , "dledford@redhat.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] RDMA/hns: Bug fixes in hns RoCE driver Message-ID: <20171128190826.GR29104@mtr-leonro.local> References: <1511750484-102395-1-git-send-email-xavier.huwei@huawei.com> <20171127183637.GA13966@ziepe.ca> <20171128061517.GO29104@mtr-leonro.local> <6e9c4251-8e56-54e2-b186-d3d5b1b85204@intel.com> <20171128183910.GA21325@ziepe.ca> <1511895042.28512.6.camel@wdc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GeONROBiaq1zPAtT" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1511895042.28512.6.camel@wdc.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --GeONROBiaq1zPAtT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 06:50:44PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 11:39 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 08:20:09AM -0500, Dennis Dalessandro wrote: > > > I could resubmit just the series, or you could just pick the 4 driver > > > patches from patchworks whatever is easiest. > > > > I marked them in patchworks, but can you review the commit messages > > and make sure you think Linus will see them as rc material too? > > My understanding is that the rc stage is intended primarily for fixes for > bugs introduced during the merge window. For all patches that do not fix > bugs introduced during the merge window it should be evaluated carefully > whether or not these are important enough to be included in a rc pull request. I had the same feeling in the previous cycles. Thanks > > Bart. --GeONROBiaq1zPAtT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEkhr/r4Op1/04yqaB5GN7iDZyWKcFAlodtCoACgkQ5GN7iDZy WKcD6Q//abxQsWpE0usSVrtVwROdm1c1268DbcuFdXukHJY3ybo6ap7jiDjSPTCm zdOhg7AwGSZms2LU7wLJrr0vnAcrgs9rNJ+IZpBir/sW0Q7qGfgGqhT3BOPs94ot yDjJA3i5ioAzt6v9VHmJz0JNsHivhHtaMEIXu62KGXHu0T+Y0fcXNQ1Fq2I3qzvQ 2UttwSbT7ZjD6SaQov9K7b/nuG3113uw2aLFFrd0O6LqGmqynRFyK0gl5Dq1sah3 91lO0J/vxEh6e6+NkVE050fvP1kZeCoBXkAjFeYIb7AubDVzbvncwiOTJxmoJuDO TkQKvoUw2OI5++nXDq17Tshv5xA2QgjDX6ppzmEowJQTx3PvtLIKA4AaeYFHyomg qCwSbEQEJC0cj63XovqJocNFAsqP8DCwfPHVaVMiO3ft8GK9LSee44cJTKUCKMLV s6x+wiuA+FfCAdKH6eJQeIdaEDjxHHAOkl5pQKPC/0mkqWOQCp8XBav3vBGwUQRq chBMnGgfMtKINQygQU1Rm/W8ihnGNpra5wuAWCIrhFR2EQnJc4cUpTSD4A+7yEaJ CEGQjtt33cz/kKHI1UdTNu6XcjhKNdzPqezhP2QnbIQmdY/oPHCkUA2uNmwQ3KDd jkso6chUZe5uVgpo81N6zqtLZEKvG6W1c1IRtScVRWaRWNqqbNE= =pQnt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GeONROBiaq1zPAtT--