From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S932217AbdK1Uhv (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:37:51 -0500
Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:31184 "EHLO mga02.intel.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1753997AbdK1Uht (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:37:49 -0500
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.44,468,1505804400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="6962776"
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 22:37:48 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
        platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, x86@kernel.org,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 11/11] intel_sgx: driver documentation
Message-ID: <20171128203748.vnf6qxs526djghin@linux.intel.com>
References: <20171113194528.28557-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
 <20171113194528.28557-12-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
 <20171117214310.GB25974@fury>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1711180023440.2186@nanos>
 <20171120230843.ozqhqhj5h3uuds3f@linux.intel.com>
 <1511802219.9392.44.camel@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <1511802219.9392.44.camel@intel.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 09:03:39AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> I have a branch based on Jarkko's patches (I believe it's up-to-date with v5)
> that implements what I described.  I'd be happy to send RFC patches if that
> would help.

That would only slow things down. The code is easy to move around and
I'm doing infrastructure changes as part of the review process. The
latest version (v6) that I sent on Sat has struct sgx_epc_page removed
just to name an example.

Rather than sending any deprecated patches it would be more useful to
get input (in English) on directory layout.

I guess you missed v6 as it I had to drop the 01.org list temporarily.
It will be back in v7 as I was able to retrieve the admin password and
configure it in suitable way.

/Jarkko