From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, axboe@fb.com,
anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com, hch@lst.de,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] um: Convert ubd driver to blk-mq
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 22:46:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171129214651.GA5846@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171126131053.32300-1-richard@nod.at>
On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 02:10:53PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> MAX_SG is 64, used for blk_queue_max_segments(). This comes from
> a0044bdf60c2 ("uml: batch I/O requests"). Is this still a good/sane
> value for blk-mq?
blk-mq itself doesn't change the tradeoff.
> The driver does IO batching, for each request it issues many UML struct
> io_thread_req request to the IO thread on the host side.
> One io_thread_req per SG page.
> Before the conversion the driver used blk_end_request() to indicate that
> a part of the request is done.
> blk_mq_end_request() does not take a length parameter, therefore we can
> only mark the whole request as done. See the new is_last property on the
> driver.
> Maybe there is a way to partially end requests too in blk-mq?
You can, take a look at scsi_end_request which handles this for blk-mq
and the legacy layer. That being said I wonder if batching really
makes that much sene if you execute each segment separately?
> Another obstacle with IO batching is that UML IO thread requests can
> fail. Not only due to OOM, also because the pipe between the UML kernel
> process and the host IO thread can return EAGAIN.
> In this case the driver puts the request into a list and retried later
> again when the pipe turns writable.
> I’m not sure whether this restart logic makes sense with blk-mq, maybe
> there is a way in blk-mq to put back a (partial) request?
blk_mq_requeue_request requeues requests that have been partially
exectuted (or not at all for that matter).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-29 21:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-26 13:10 [PATCH] [RFC] um: Convert ubd driver to blk-mq Richard Weinberger
[not found] ` <281c725e-336f-8745-b3c5-0e57421d6335@kot-begemot.co.uk>
2017-11-26 13:56 ` [uml-devel] " Richard Weinberger
2017-11-26 14:42 ` Anton Ivanov
2017-11-29 21:46 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2017-12-03 21:54 ` Richard Weinberger
2017-12-03 22:23 ` Anton Ivanov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171129214651.GA5846@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox