From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751322AbdK3UBl (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 30 Nov 2017 15:01:41 -0500
Received: from mail-wm0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]:37688 "EHLO
        mail-wm0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1750768AbdK3UBk (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 30 Nov 2017 15:01:40 -0500
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMZOuzvrFW23V+tYAED4cvYTFSlZ2GfuAMF80055Cf8D7OMwLT3aDUtoicdRqJ2vYUGStWovxg==
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 21:01:34 +0100
From: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@gmail.com>
To: Hartley Sweeten <HartleyS@visionengravers.com>
Cc: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        "arndbergmann@gmail.com" <arndbergmann@gmail.com>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
        "Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: cosmetic: Add some
 description to ts72xx code
Message-Id: <20171130210134.e6f23f8996e58e6adb79654b@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BLUPR0101MB155444953DA2E47B0AEE80BFD0380@BLUPR0101MB1554.prod.exchangelabs.com>
References: <20171116232239.16823-1-lukma@denx.de>
        <20171130004510.23887-1-lukma@denx.de>
        <20171130004510.23887-6-lukma@denx.de>
        <BLUPR0101MB155444953DA2E47B0AEE80BFD0380@BLUPR0101MB1554.prod.exchangelabs.com>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.6.0 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hello Hartley!

On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 17:23:02 +0000
Hartley Sweeten <HartleyS@visionengravers.com> wrote:

> > +/**********************************************************************
> > +***
> > + * IO map
> > + 
> > +***********************************************************************
> > +**/
> 
> There is also something funny with the patch. The lines above appear to be getting split incorrectly.

That's definitely not the case, I can apply the patch to 4.14 just fine and
there is no funny wrapping. But you are right about the rest, it should be
re-based.

-- 
Alexander Sverdlin.