From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751456AbdLAQCM (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Dec 2017 11:02:12 -0500 Received: from mail-io0-f170.google.com ([209.85.223.170]:32923 "EHLO mail-io0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750763AbdLAQCJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Dec 2017 11:02:09 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMZE3CmerVdnhG9DJQD10+9Mbn5Wt9o8bpEhBZkybdzejUYRCqyHlNQewheWItCNJTnCJE9zRQ== Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 09:02:04 -0700 From: Jason Gunthorpe To: Michal Hocko Cc: Dan Williams , Andrew Morton , Linux MM , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Christoph Hellwig , "stable@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" , linux-rdma Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] mm: introduce get_user_pages_longterm Message-ID: <20171201160204.GI7754@ziepe.ca> References: <151197872943.26211.6551382719053304996.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <151197873499.26211.11687422577653326365.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <20171130095323.ovrq2nenb6ztiapy@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20171130174201.stbpuye4gu5rxwkm@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20171130181741.2y5nyflyhqxg6y5p@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20171130190117.GF7754@ziepe.ca> <20171201101218.mxjyv4fc4cjwhf2o@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171201101218.mxjyv4fc4cjwhf2o@dhcp22.suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 11:12:18AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Thu 30-11-17 12:01:17, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:32:42AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote: > > > > Who and how many LRU pages can pin that way and how do you prevent nasty > > > > users to DoS systems this way? > > > > > > I assume this is something the RDMA community has had to contend with? > > > I'm not an RDMA person, I'm just here to fix dax. > > > > The RDMA implementation respects the mlock rlimit > > OK, so then I am kind of lost in why do we need a special g-u-p variant. > The documentation doesn't say and quite contrary it assumes that the > caller knows what he is doing. This cannot be the right approach. I thought it was because get_user_pages_longterm is supposed to fail on DAX mappings? And maybe we should think about moving the rlimit accounting into this new function too someday? Jason