From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
To: Philippe Mikoyan <philippe.mikoyan@skat.systems>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
manfred@colorfullife.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
edgar.kaziakhmedov@virtuozzo.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ipc: Fix ipc data structures inconsistency
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 09:20:07 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171201172007.q2rqmo4jqaxb63tk@linux-n805> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171130061224.25466-3-philippe.mikoyan@skat.systems>
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017, Philippe Mikoyan wrote:
>As described in the title, this patch fixes <ipc>id_ds inconsistency
>when <ipc>ctl_stat runs concurrently with some ds-changing function,
>e.g. shmat, msgsnd or whatever.
>
>For instance, if shmctl(IPC_STAT) is running concurrently with shmat,
>following data structure can be returned:
>{... shm_lpid = 0, shm_nattch = 1, ...}
Hmm yeah that's pretty fishy, also shm_atime = 0, no?
So I think this patch is fine as we can obviously race at a user level.
This is another justification for converting the ipc lock to rwlock;
performance wise they are the pretty much the same (being queued)...
but that's irrelevant to this patch. I like that you manage to do
security and such checks still only under rcu, like all ipc calls
work; *_stat() is no longer special.
With a nit below:
Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
>diff --git a/ipc/util.c b/ipc/util.c
>index 78755873cc5b..8d3c3946c825 100644
>--- a/ipc/util.c
>+++ b/ipc/util.c
>@@ -22,9 +22,12 @@
> * tree.
> * - perform initial checks (capabilities, auditing and permission,
> * etc).
>- * - perform read-only operations, such as STAT, INFO commands.
>+ * - perform read-only operations, such as INFO command, that
>+ * do not demand atomicity
> * acquire the ipc lock (kern_ipc_perm.lock) through
> * ipc_lock_object()
>+ * - perform read-only operatoins that demand atomicity,
^^ typo
>+ * such as STAT command.
> * - perform data updates, such as SET, RMID commands and
> * mechanism-specific operations (semop/semtimedop,
> * msgsnd/msgrcv, shmat/shmdt).
Thanks,
Davidlohr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-01 17:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-30 6:12 [PATCH 0/2] ipc: Fix <ipc>ctl(..IPC_STAT..) bugs Philippe Mikoyan
2017-11-30 6:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] ipc/shm: Fix shm_nattch incorrect value Philippe Mikoyan
2017-11-30 6:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] ipc: Fix ipc data structures inconsistency Philippe Mikoyan
2017-12-01 17:20 ` Davidlohr Bueso [this message]
2017-12-02 6:03 ` Manfred Spraul
2017-12-02 14:43 ` Philippe Mikoyan
2017-12-03 1:37 ` Davidlohr Bueso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171201172007.q2rqmo4jqaxb63tk@linux-n805 \
--to=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=edgar.kaziakhmedov@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=philippe.mikoyan@skat.systems \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox