From: Scott Bauer <scott.bauer@intel.com>
To: dm-devel@redhat.com
Cc: snitzer@redhat.com, agk@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Scott Bauer <scott.bauer@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] dm unstripe: Add documentation for unstripe target
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 15:50:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171204225051.3043-2-scott.bauer@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171204225051.3043-1-scott.bauer@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Scott Bauer <scott.bauer@intel.com>
---
Documentation/device-mapper/dm-unstripe.txt | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 82 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/device-mapper/dm-unstripe.txt
diff --git a/Documentation/device-mapper/dm-unstripe.txt b/Documentation/device-mapper/dm-unstripe.txt
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..7060f1b53db3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/device-mapper/dm-unstripe.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+Device-Mapper Unstripe
+=====================
+
+The device-mapper Unstripe (dm-unstripe) target provides a transparent
+mechanism to unstripe a RAID 0 striping to access segregated disks.
+
+This module should be used by users who understand what the underlying
+disks look like behind the Software/Hardware RAID.
+
+Parameters:
+<drive (ex: /dev/nvme0n1)> <drive #> <# of drives> <stripe sectors>
+
+
+<drive>
+ The block device you wish to unstripe.
+
+<drive #>
+ The physical drive you wish to expose via this "virtual" device
+ mapper target. This must be 0 indexed.
+
+<# of drives>
+ The number of drives in the RAID 0.
+
+<stripe sectors>
+ The amount of 512B sectors in the raid striping, or zero, if you
+ wish you use max_hw_sector_size.
+
+
+Why use this module?
+=====================
+
+As a use case:
+
+
+ As an example:
+
+ Intel NVMe drives contain two cores on the physical device.
+ Each core of the drive has segregated access to its LBA range.
+ The current LBA model has a RAID 0 128k stripe across the two cores:
+
+ Core 0: Core 1:
+ __________ __________
+ | LBA 511| | LBA 768|
+ | LBA 0 | | LBA 256|
+ ⎻⎻⎻⎻⎻⎻⎻⎻⎻⎻ ⎻⎻⎻⎻⎻⎻⎻⎻⎻⎻
+
+ The purpose of this unstriping is to provide better QoS in noisy
+ neighbor environments. When two partitions are created on the
+ aggregate drive without this unstriping, reads on one partition
+ can affect writes on another partition. With the striping concurrent
+ reads and writes and I/O on opposite cores have lower completion times,
+ and better tail latencies.
+
+ With the module we were able to segregate a fio script that has read and
+ write jobs that are independent of each other. Compared to when we run
+ the test on a combined drive with partitions, we were able to get a 92%
+ reduction in five-9ths read latency using this device mapper target.
+
+
+ One could use the module to Logical de-pop a HDD if you have sufficient
+ geomoetry information regarding the drive.
+
+
+Example scripts:
+====================
+
+dmsetup create nvmset1 --table '0 1 dm-unstripe /dev/nvme0n1 1 2 0'
+dmsetup create nvmset0 --table '0 1 dm-unstripe /dev/nvme0n1 0 2 0'
+
+There will now be two mappers:
+/dev/mapper/nvmset1
+/dev/mapper/nvmset0
+
+that will expose core 1 and core 2.
+
+
+In a Raid 0 with 4 drives of stripe size 128K:
+dmsetup create raid_disk0 --table '0 1 dm-unstripe /dev/nvme0n1 0 4 256'
+dmsetup create raid_disk1 --table '0 1 dm-unstripe /dev/nvme0n1 1 4 256'
+dmsetup create raid_disk2 --table '0 1 dm-unstripe /dev/nvme0n1 2 4 256'
+dmsetup create raid_disk3 --table '0 1 dm-unstripe /dev/nvme0n1 3 4 256'
+
--
2.11.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-04 23:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-04 22:50 [PATCH 1/2] dm-unstripe: unstripe of IO across RAID 0 Scott Bauer
2017-12-04 22:50 ` Scott Bauer [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171204225051.3043-2-scott.bauer@intel.com \
--to=scott.bauer@intel.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox