From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, bcrl@kvack.org, tj@kernel.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-aio@kvack.org, jmoyer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] aio: Add memcg accounting of user used data
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 13:43:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171206124321.GC7515@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <da69b3a4-f4a7-f957-5828-2edee2009b02@virtuozzo.com>
On Wed 06-12-17 15:36:56, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> On 06.12.2017 15:23, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Tue 05-12-17 13:00:54, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> > [...]
> >> This meets the problem in case of many containers
> >> are used on the hardware node. Since aio_max_nr is
> >> a global limit, any container may occupy the whole
> >> available aio requests, and to deprive others the
> >> possibility to use aio at all. The situation may
> >> happen because of evil intentions of the container's
> >> user or because of the program error, when the user
> >> makes this occasionally
> >
> > I am sorry to beat more on this but finally got around to
> > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/17b22d53-ad3d-1ba8-854f-fc2a43d86c44@virtuozzo.com
> > and read the above paragraph once again. I can see how accounting to
> > a memcg helps to reduce the memory footprint but I fail to see how it
> > helps the above scenario. Could you clarify wow you set up a limit to
> > prevent anybody from DoSing other containers by depleting aio_max_nr?
> The memcg limit allows to increase aio_max_nr and the accounting guarantees
> container can't exceed the limit. You may configure the limit and aio_max_nr
> in the way, all containers requests in sum never reach aio_max_nr.
So you are essentially saying that you make aio_max_nr unlimited and
rely on the memory consumption tracking by memcg, right? Are there any
downsides (e.g. clog the AIO subsytem)?
Please make sure that all this in the changelog.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-06 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-05 10:00 [PATCH] aio: Add memcg accounting of user used data Kirill Tkhai
2017-12-05 15:15 ` Michal Hocko
2017-12-05 15:34 ` Kirill Tkhai
2017-12-05 15:43 ` Michal Hocko
2017-12-05 16:02 ` Kirill Tkhai
2017-12-06 9:05 ` Michal Hocko
2017-12-06 10:00 ` Kirill Tkhai
2017-12-06 12:23 ` Michal Hocko
2017-12-06 12:36 ` Kirill Tkhai
2017-12-06 12:43 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2017-12-06 13:13 ` Kirill Tkhai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171206124321.GC7515@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=ktkhai@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox