From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753628AbdLHNFx (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Dec 2017 08:05:53 -0500 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:51343 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753230AbdLHNFn (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Dec 2017 08:05:43 -0500 X-Amp-Result: UNSCANNABLE X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.45,377,1508828400"; d="scan'208";a="1162120" Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 15:05:38 +0200 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: James Bottomley Cc: Christoph Hellwig , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Viro , "open list:FILESYSTEMS (VFS and infrastructure)" Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 09/11] fs/pipe.c: export create_pipe_files() and replace_fd() Message-ID: <20171208130538.quwqaqvawbqmehpf@linux.intel.com> References: <20171125193132.24321-10-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <20171128143504.GA22918@infradead.org> <20171128204220.j7ipouoyhsbvm7zk@linux.intel.com> <20171128210551.GA12431@infradead.org> <20171128215753.qnu5krswowjq6gwn@linux.intel.com> <20171129231357.GA23443@infradead.org> <20171130164321.juvn67pu4jrjq76j@linux.intel.com> <1512067110.3020.24.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <20171204090059.wgys4vpqklampcpy@linux.intel.com> <20171207173738.yfzvdo2vpgaof4ax@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171207173738.yfzvdo2vpgaof4ax@linux.intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 07:37:38PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > I think I could replace pipes with anonymous inodes. Is that a better > idea than pipes? I can work on that v8 if the export is a show stopper > as it seems. We are using that to do some other stuff in tpm_vtpm_proxy. I'll go with the anon inode solution. It should be fairly easy to implement. /Jarkko