From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Quan Xu <quan.xu0@gmail.com>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com, yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ben Luo <bn0418@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/7] kvm pvtimer
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 10:10:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171208151014.GE12069@x230.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1512722390-3654-1-git-send-email-quan.xu0@gmail.com>
On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 04:39:43PM +0800, Quan Xu wrote:
> From: Ben Luo <bn0418@gmail.com>
>
> This patchset introduces a new paravirtualized mechanism to reduce VM-exit
> caused by guest timer accessing.
And how bad is this blib in arming the timer?
And how often do you get this timer to be armed? OR better yet - what
are the workloads in which you found this VMExit to be painful?
Thanks. Or better yet - what
are the workloads in which you found this VMExit to be painful?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-08 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-08 8:39 [PATCH RFC 0/7] kvm pvtimer Quan Xu
2017-12-08 8:39 ` [PATCH RFC 1/7] kvm: x86: emulate MSR_KVM_PV_TIMER_EN MSR Quan Xu
2017-12-08 8:39 ` [PATCH RFC 2/7] kvm: x86: add a function to exchange value Quan Xu
2017-12-08 8:39 ` [PATCH RFC 3/7] KVM: timer: synchronize tsc-deadline timestamp for guest Quan Xu
2017-12-08 15:06 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-12-14 1:54 ` Quan Xu
2017-12-08 8:39 ` [PATCH RFC 4/7] KVM: timer: program timer to a dedicated CPU Quan Xu
2017-12-08 8:39 ` [PATCH RFC 5/7] KVM: timer: ignore timer migration if pvtimer is enabled Quan Xu
2017-12-08 8:39 ` [PATCH RFC 6/7] Doc/KVM: introduce a new cpuid bit for kvm pvtimer Quan Xu
2017-12-08 8:39 ` [PATCH RFC 7/7] kvm: guest: reprogram guest timer Quan Xu
2017-12-08 15:10 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
[not found] ` <CAFv8KnF1Re7Zn2LVvqh=Sr8MmaWJJwZBB1i5ws03GvPVKXRjzA@mail.gmail.com>
2017-12-13 16:28 ` [PATCH RFC 0/7] kvm pvtimer Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-12-14 2:32 ` Quan Xu
2017-12-14 11:56 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-12-14 12:06 ` Quan Xu
2017-12-14 13:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171208151014.GE12069@x230.dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=bn0418@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=quan.xu0@gmail.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox