From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752183AbdLKBZZ (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Sun, 10 Dec 2017 20:25:25 -0500
Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:14113 "EHLO mga14.intel.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1751526AbdLKBZY (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Sun, 10 Dec 2017 20:25:24 -0500
X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN
X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN
X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.45,391,1508828400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="183094323"
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 17:22:53 -0800
From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
To: Brice Goglin <brice.goglin@gmail.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <h.peter.anvin@intel.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
        Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com>,
        Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
        "Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
        Sai Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>, x86 <x86@kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/intel_rdt: Classify /proc/cpuinfo flag bits and add
 missing bits in documentation
Message-ID: <20171211012252.GA65487@linux.intel.com>
References: <1512779102-45295-1-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com>
 <3690e566-27df-9931-fb89-31c8e117a314@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <3690e566-27df-9931-fb89-31c8e117a314@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sat, Dec 09, 2017 at 10:58:01PM +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Le 09/12/2017 à 01:25, Fenghua Yu a écrit :
> > From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
> >
> > With more flag bits in /proc/cpuinfo for RDT, it's better to classify the
> > bits for readability.
> >
> > Some previously missing bits are added as well.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/x86/intel_rdt_ui.txt | 7 ++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/x86/intel_rdt_ui.txt b/Documentation/x86/intel_rdt_ui.txt
> > index 6851854..9b62738 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/x86/intel_rdt_ui.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/x86/intel_rdt_ui.txt
> > @@ -7,7 +7,12 @@ Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> >  Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@intel.com>
> >  
> >  This feature is enabled by the CONFIG_INTEL_RDT Kconfig and the
> > -X86 /proc/cpuinfo flag bits "rdt", "cqm", "cat_l3" and "cdp_l3".
> > +X86 /proc/cpuinfo flag bits:
> > +RDT (Resource Director Technology) Allocation - "rdt_a"
> > +CAT (Cache Allocation Technology) - "cat_l3", "cdp_l3", "cat_l2"
> 
> Why not "Code and Data Prioritization" for cdp_l3?

CDP is an extension of CAT. So I just put cdp_l3 into the CAT class.

Thanks.

-Fenghua