From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@wp.pl>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] new byteorder primitives - ..._{replace,get}_bits()
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 23:48:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171212234856.GZ21978@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171212120409.64b6362e@cakuba.netronome.com>
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 12:04:09PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > static __always_inline u64 mask_to_multiplier(u64 mask)
> > {
> > return mask & (mask ^ (mask - 1));
> > }
D'oh. Even simpler than that, of course -
static __always_inline u64 mask_to_multiplier(u64 mask)
{
return mask & -mask;
}
> Very nice! The compilation-time check if the value can fit in a field
> covered by the mask (if they're both known) did help me catch bugs
> early a few times over the years, so if it could be preserved we can
> maybe even drop the FIELD_* macros and just use this approach?
Umm... Something like this, perhaps? Same bunch, plus u{16,32,64}_...
variants for host-endian. Adding sanity check on mask is also not
hard, but I don't know how useful it actually is...
diff --git a/include/linux/byteorder/generic.h b/include/linux/byteorder/generic.h
index 451aaa0786ae..a032de9aa03d 100644
--- a/include/linux/byteorder/generic.h
+++ b/include/linux/byteorder/generic.h
@@ -187,4 +187,36 @@ static inline void be32_to_cpu_array(u32 *dst, const __be32 *src, size_t len)
dst[i] = be32_to_cpu(src[i]);
}
+extern void __compiletime_error("value doesn't fit into mask")
+__field_overflow(void);
+static __always_inline u64 mask_to_multiplier(u64 mask)
+{
+ return mask & -mask;
+}
+
+#define ____MAKE_OP(type,base,to,from) \
+static __always_inline __##type type##_replace_bits(__##type old, \
+ base val, base mask) \
+{ \
+ __##type m = to(mask); \
+ if (__builtin_constant_p(val) && \
+ (val & ~(mask/mask_to_multiplier(mask)))) \
+ __field_overflow(); \
+ return (old & ~m) | \
+ (to(val * mask_to_multiplier(mask)) & m); \
+} \
+static __always_inline base type##_get_bits(__##type v, base mask) \
+{ \
+ return (from(v) & mask)/mask_to_multiplier(mask); \
+}
+#define __MAKE_OP(size) \
+ ____MAKE_OP(le##size,u##size,cpu_to_le##size,le##size##_to_cpu) \
+ ____MAKE_OP(be##size,u##size,cpu_to_be##size,be##size##_to_cpu) \
+ ____MAKE_OP(u##size,u##size,,)
+__MAKE_OP(16)
+__MAKE_OP(32)
+__MAKE_OP(64)
+#undef __MAKE_OP
+#undef ____MAKE_OP
+
#endif /* _LINUX_BYTEORDER_GENERIC_H */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-12 23:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20171210045326.GO21978@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
[not found] ` <420a198d-61f8-81cf-646d-10446cb41def@synopsys.com>
[not found] ` <20171211050520.GV21978@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
2017-12-11 5:38 ` [RFC][PATCH] apparent big-endian bugs in dwc-xlgmac Al Viro
2017-12-11 6:46 ` Jie Deng
2017-12-11 15:54 ` [RFC][PATCH] new byteorder primitives - ..._{replace,get}_bits() Al Viro
2017-12-12 4:02 ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-12-12 6:20 ` Al Viro
2017-12-12 19:45 ` Al Viro
2017-12-12 20:04 ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-12-12 23:48 ` Al Viro [this message]
2017-12-12 23:59 ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-12-13 0:36 ` Al Viro
2017-12-13 1:04 ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-12-13 1:30 ` Al Viro
2017-12-13 1:35 ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-12-13 1:51 ` Al Viro
2017-12-13 2:44 ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-12-13 14:22 ` Al Viro
2017-12-13 17:45 ` Al Viro
2017-12-15 2:33 ` [RFC][PATCH] Add primitives for manipulating bitfields both in host- and fixed-endian Al Viro
2017-12-15 5:07 ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-12-15 5:34 ` Al Viro
2017-12-15 16:48 ` [RFC][PATCH v2] " Al Viro
2017-12-13 19:04 ` [RFC][PATCH] new byteorder primitives - ..._{replace,get}_bits() Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171212234856.GZ21978@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=kubakici@wp.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox