From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751761AbdLNLHx (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Dec 2017 06:07:53 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:56670 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751624AbdLNLHw (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Dec 2017 06:07:52 -0500 Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 12:07:34 +0100 From: Heiko Carstens To: SF Markus Elfring Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Jan =?iso-8859-1?Q?H=F6ppner?= , Martin Schwidefsky , Stefan Haberland , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] S390-DASD: Fine-tuning for some function implementations References: <4af00744-1c8a-6b33-22c8-d26d569f6c5f@users.sourceforge.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 17121411-0040-0000-0000-0000041A0DEB X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 17121411-0041-0000-0000-000020BD23A5 Message-Id: <20171214110734.GD4238@osiris> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2017-12-14_05:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1709140000 definitions=main-1712140155 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 11:34:01AM +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > > Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 19:43:21 +0200 > > > > A few update suggestions were taken into account > > from static source code analysis. > > > > Markus Elfring (3): > > Adjust buffer output in dasd_hosts_print() > > Fix typos in two comment lines > > Adjust six checks for null pointers > > > > drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c | 24 +++++++++++------------- > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > > Are there any chances that such change possibilities (and further adjustments) > will be integrated in this software area? No.