From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com>
Cc: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com>,
robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, rpurdie@rpsys.net,
sakari.ailus@iki.fi, laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-leds@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: as3645a: Fix checkpatch warnings
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 23:50:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171214225041.GB10957@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <799ae164-701a-87ce-fadf-8278f01c10d6@ti.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1144 bytes --]
On Wed 2017-12-13 14:49:38, Dan Murphy wrote:
> Pavel and Laurent
>
> On 12/13/2017 02:43 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> > Dan,
> >
> > On 12/13/2017 09:41 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
> >> Jacek
> >>
> >> On 12/13/2017 02:29 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> >>> Hi Dan,
> >>>
> >>> checkpatch.pl doesn't want to be mentioned in the patch subject :-)
> >>>
> >>
> >> Ack
> >>
> >>> "WARNING: A patch subject line should describe the change not the tool
> >>> that found it"
> >>>
> >>> Preferably I'd see two separate patches.
> >>>
> >>
> >> So you want me to split them up? I have no issue with that.
> >
> > Yeah, it will be easier to come up with concise but meaningful
> > subjects.
> >
>
> When I split these up can I add your Acked-by to each patch or would you prefer to resend your
> Acked-by for each patch?
You can keep the ack...
...and my preference would be for trivial fixes like these to be just
applied. No need to resend 3 versions etc...
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-14 22:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-12 21:50 [PATCH] leds: as3645a: Fix checkpatch warnings Dan Murphy
2017-12-12 23:35 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-12-13 12:56 ` Pavel Machek
2017-12-13 20:29 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2017-12-13 20:41 ` Dan Murphy
2017-12-13 20:43 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2017-12-13 20:49 ` Dan Murphy
2017-12-13 21:32 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-12-14 22:50 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2017-12-14 22:49 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171214225041.GB10957@amd \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmurphy@ti.com \
--cc=jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=rpurdie@rpsys.net \
--cc=sakari.ailus@iki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox