From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754881AbdLOCrP (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Dec 2017 21:47:15 -0500 Received: from mail-pg0-f47.google.com ([74.125.83.47]:42261 "EHLO mail-pg0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754718AbdLOCrL (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Dec 2017 21:47:11 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBouA5CkiXCMWhgNvWRNjv71+Zw6IeH6/buz1FBfCWaAdeD/hdN0W2eSsy2YQuqyibWg3ArOeXQ== Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 11:47:06 +0900 From: Sergey Senozhatsky To: David Howells , Eric Biggers Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" , keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Sergey Senozhatsky Subject: [question] should 363b02dab09b3 be backported to stable 4.1+? Message-ID: <20171215024706.GB11199@jagdpanzerIV> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello David, Eric, please help me out. I'm looking at 363b02dab09b ("KEYS: Fix race between updating and finding a negative key") right now. So, I see that it has been backported to stable 4.4+. My question is -- do we have those test_bit(KEY_FLAG_INSTANTIATED) and test_bit(KEY_FLAG_NEGATIVE) races in stable 4.1? -ss