From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S932537AbdLOPus (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Fri, 15 Dec 2017 10:50:48 -0500
Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:57974 "EHLO
        foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S932311AbdLOPup (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 15 Dec 2017 10:50:45 -0500
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 15:50:41 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: arm@kernel.org, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Select schedutil as default cpufreq
 governor
Message-ID: <20171215155040.mlvd56i2rfgd2e2t@armageddon.cambridge.arm.com>
References: <af12e002bc165844101830c0eb00e283b536a879.1510813288.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <af12e002bc165844101830c0eb00e283b536a879.1510813288.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 11:51:36AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Currently performance governor is getting selected by default, which is
> surely not a very good choice as its pretty much power hungry.
> 
> Select schedutil instead.

And why do we care about this in defconfig? People deploying their own
kernels in mobile may opt for this config, others may prefer the default
governor.

Also it seems it would be the only architecture make this governor the
default, so NAK.

-- 
Catalin