Re: [PATCH v1 01/10] dt-bindings: media: Add Renesas CEU bindings

jacopo mondi
2017-11-15T18:15:20Z

Hi Geert,

On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 02:07:31PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Jacopo,
>
> CC devicetree folks

Yeah, sorry I forgot them. Sorry about this and thanks for adding the
address back!

>
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Jacopo Mondi
> <jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org> wrote:
> > Add bindings documentation for Renesas Capture Engine Unit (CEU).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org>
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/media/renesas,ceu.txt | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 87 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/renesas,ceu.txt
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/renesas,ceu.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/renesas,ceu.txt
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..a88e9cb
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/renesas,ceu.txt
> > @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
> > +Renesas Capture Engine Unit (CEU)
> > +----------------------------------------------
> > +
> > +The Capture Engine Unit is the image capture interface found on Renesas
> > +RZ chip series and on SH Mobile ones.
> > +
> > +The interface supports a single parallel input with up 8/16bits data bus width.
>
> ... with data bus widths up to 8/16 bits?
>
> > +
> > +Required properties:
> > +- compatible
> > + Must be "renesas,renesas-ceu".
>
> The double "renesas" part looks odd to me. What about "renesas,ceu"?

I'm totally open for better "compatible" strings here, so yeah, let's
got for the shorter one you proposed...

> Shouldn't you add SoC-specific compatible values like "renesas,r7s72100-ceu",
> too?

Well, I actually have no SoC-specific data in the driver, so I don't
need SoC specific "compatible" values. But if it's a good practice
to have them anyway, I will add those in next spin..
>
> > +- reg
> > + Physical address base and size.
> > +- interrupts
> > + The interrupt line number.
>
> interrupt specifier

Yeah, it's not just the line number...

>

[snip]

> > +i2c1: i2c@fcfee400 {
> > + pinctrl-names = "default";
> > + pinctrl-0 = <&i2c1_pins>;
> > +
> > + status = "okay";
> > + clock-frequency = <100000>;
> > +
> > + ov7670: camera@21 {
> > + compatible = "ovti,ov7670";
> > + reg = <0x21>;
> > +
> > + pinctrl-names = "default";
> > + pinctrl-0 = <&vio_pins>;
> > +
> > + reset-gpios = <&port3 11 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> > + powerdown-gpios = <&port3 12 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> > +
> > + clocks = <&xclk>;
> > + clock-names = "xclk";
> > +
> > + xclk: fixed_clk {
> > + compatible = "fixed-clock";
> > + #clock-cells = <0>;
> > + clock-frequency = <24000000>;
> > + };

As Sakari pointed out in his review, this fixed clock is a detail
specific to the sensor used in the example (ov7670). For sake of
simplicity I can remove it.

Thanks
j