From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@gmail.com>,
julia.lawall@lip6.fr
Subject: [PATCH v1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Revert "Make 'bt_sfi_data' const"
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 12:08:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171228100801.67744-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> (raw)
The annoying static analyzer follow up patches make a pain rather then
fixing issues.
The one done by commit 276c87054751
("x86/platform/intel-mid: Make 'bt_sfi_data' const")
made an obvious regression [BugLink] since the struct bt_sfi_data used
as a temporary container for important data that is used to fill
'parent' and 'name' fields in struct platform_device_info.
That's why revert the commit which had been apparently done w/o reading
the code.
BugLink: https://github.com/andy-shev/linux/issues/20
Cc: Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@gmail.com>
Cc: julia.lawall@lip6.fr
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_bt.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_bt.c b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_bt.c
index dc036e511f48..5a0483e7bf66 100644
--- a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_bt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_bt.c
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static int __init tng_bt_sfi_setup(struct bt_sfi_data *ddata)
return 0;
}
-static const struct bt_sfi_data tng_bt_sfi_data __initdata = {
+static struct bt_sfi_data tng_bt_sfi_data __initdata = {
.setup = tng_bt_sfi_setup,
};
--
2.15.1
next reply other threads:[~2017-12-28 10:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-28 10:08 Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2017-12-28 10:28 ` [PATCH v1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Revert "Make 'bt_sfi_data' const" Ingo Molnar
2017-12-28 10:34 ` Julia Lawall
2017-12-28 11:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-12-28 11:23 ` Julia Lawall
2017-12-28 11:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-12-28 12:12 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-12-28 12:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-12-28 12:25 ` Julia Lawall
2017-12-28 12:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-12-28 12:37 ` Julia Lawall
2017-12-28 12:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-12-28 14:00 ` Julia Lawall
2017-12-28 15:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-12-28 15:28 ` Julia Lawall
2017-12-28 21:22 ` Julia Lawall
2018-01-01 15:15 ` Julia Lawall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171228100801.67744-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=bhumirks@gmail.com \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox