From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: perf test BPF failing on 4.15.0-rc6
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 15:33:07 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180103183307.GC13097@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180103182701.GB13097@kernel.org>
Em Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 03:27:01PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > Continuing investigation...
>
> After applying the fallback patch to allow new tools to work with older
> kernels:
>
> [root@felicio ~]# perf test bpf
> 39: BPF filter :
> 39.1: Basic BPF filtering : Ok
> 39.2: BPF pinning : Ok
> 39.3: BPF prologue generation : Ok
> 39.4: BPF relocation checker : Ok
> [root@felicio ~]# uname -a
> Linux felicio.ghostprotocols.net 4.13.0-rc7+ #1 SMP Mon Sep 11 13:56:18 -03 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> [root@felicio ~]# rpm -q glibc
> glibc-2.17-157.el7_3.2.x86_64
> [root@felicio ~]#
>
> After applying the patch below I get to, which is what I am trying to
> fix now:
>
> [root@jouet ~]# perf test bpf
> 39: BPF filter :
> 39.1: Basic BPF filtering : Ok
> 39.2: BPF pinning : Ok
> 39.3: BPF prologue generation : FAILED!
> 39.4: BPF relocation checker : Skip
> [root@jouet ~]#
Update the patch to the one at the end of this message to make it work
with older glibcs, so that we ask for epoll_pwait() and hook into that
as well().
Now checking why 39.3 fails...
- Arnaldo
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/bpf-script-example.c b/tools/perf/tests/bpf-script-example.c
index 268e5f8e4aa2..d1e67e271675 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/bpf-script-example.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/bpf-script-example.c
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ struct bpf_map_def SEC("maps") flip_table = {
.max_entries = 1,
};
-SEC("func=SyS_epoll_wait")
+SEC("func=SyS_epoll_pwait")
int bpf_func__SyS_epoll_wait(void *ctx)
{
int ind =0;
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c b/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c
index 0512f1b5bfdb..7c04e2d5b60b 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ static int epoll_wait_loop(void)
/* Should fail NR_ITERS times */
for (i = 0; i < NR_ITERS; i++)
- epoll_wait(-(i + 1), NULL, 0, 0);
+ epoll_pwait(-(i + 1), NULL, 0, 0, NULL);
return 0;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-03 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-02 18:59 perf test BPF failing on 4.15.0-rc6 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-01-03 4:42 ` Wangnan (F)
2018-01-03 4:58 ` Wangnan (F)
2018-01-03 16:58 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-01-03 18:27 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-01-03 18:33 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2018-01-03 20:13 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-01-04 1:37 ` Wangnan (F)
2018-01-04 15:39 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180103183307.GC13097@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox