public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Jianchao Wang <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>
Cc: keith.busch@intel.com, axboe@fb.com, hch@lst.de,
	sagi@grimberg.me, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme-pci: fix the timeout case when reset is ongoing
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 11:35:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180104103546.GA5109@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1514932304-29936-1-git-send-email-jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>

On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 06:31:44AM +0800, Jianchao Wang wrote:
> NVME_CTRL_RESETTING used to indicate the range of nvme initializing
> strictly in fd634f41(nvme: merge probe_work and reset_work), but it
> is not now. The NVME_CTRL_RESETTING is set before queue the
> reset_work, there could be a big gap before the reset work handles
> the outstanding requests. So when the NVME_CTRL_RESETTING is set,
> nvme_timeout will not only meet the admin requests from the
> initializing procedure, but also the IO and admin requests from
> previous work before nvme_dev_disable is invoked.
> 
> To fix it, introduce a flag NVME_DEV_FLAG_INITIALIZING to mark the
> range of initializing. When this flag is not set, handle the expried
> requests as nvme_cancel_request. Otherwise, the requests should be
> from the initializing procedure. Handle them as before. Because the
> nvme_reset_work will see the error and disable the dev itself, so
> discard the nvme_dev_disable here.

Instead of a parallel set of states we'll need to split
NVME_CTRL_RESET into NVME_CTRL_RESET_SCHEDULED and NVME_CTRL_RESETTING.

And if my memory doesn't fail me we were already considering that a while
ago.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-04 10:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-02 22:31 [PATCH] nvme-pci: fix the timeout case when reset is ongoing Jianchao Wang
2018-01-04 10:35 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2018-01-05  5:36   ` jianchao.wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180104103546.GA5109@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com \
    --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox